2002
DOI: 10.2175/193864702784162912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermentation of Return Activated Sludge to Enhance Biological Phosphorus Removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Truckee Meadows plant (Narayanan, 2002); the existing Phostrip tank consisting of the gravity thickener was used with good results. From all the referenced material, it seems that if the equivalent of around 7 to 10% of the RAS flow is diverted to a fermenter and if the solids can be retained in the fermenter for more than 2 days, fermentation of the volatile solids in the mixed liquor will produce sufficient VFA for sustaining biological phosphorus removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Truckee Meadows plant (Narayanan, 2002); the existing Phostrip tank consisting of the gravity thickener was used with good results. From all the referenced material, it seems that if the equivalent of around 7 to 10% of the RAS flow is diverted to a fermenter and if the solids can be retained in the fermenter for more than 2 days, fermentation of the volatile solids in the mixed liquor will produce sufficient VFA for sustaining biological phosphorus removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the fermentation of all the RAS as opposed to only a portion. The Pho-strip process at the Truckee-Meadows plant was successfully converted to a Phoredox process (Narayanan et al, 2002) by partitioning the aeration basin to form an anaerobic zone and then fermenting only about 10% of the RAS without the need to strip the phosphorus. No nitrification took place in this process.…”
Section: Fermentation Of Mixed Liquor or Return Activated Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less than 10% of the RAS stream was passed from the anaerobic zone to the side-stream fermenter. Narayanan et al, (2002) described the conversion of a high-rate secondary treatment process with Phostrip at the Truckee Meadows WRF in Nevada to a high rate Phoredox plant with side stream fermentation of part of the return sludge. As shown in Figure 8, when operated as Phostrip, all the RAS was passed through the stripper where fermentation took place and phosphorus was released.…”
Section: Ras Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%