Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2908805.2913014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feral Screens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could have pursued any number of alternative modes or materials for addressing our concerns. Indeed, our intention with this paper is not to argue that material exploration is better or worse than others forms of designerly inquiry (indeed, we have engaged with these in other contexts [22,28]). Rather, our point is that while alternative methods might have saved us the specific kind of trouble we encountered in our material explorations with network technology, we would have still needed to go looking for trouble elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussion: the Trouble Is The Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could have pursued any number of alternative modes or materials for addressing our concerns. Indeed, our intention with this paper is not to argue that material exploration is better or worse than others forms of designerly inquiry (indeed, we have engaged with these in other contexts [22,28]). Rather, our point is that while alternative methods might have saved us the specific kind of trouble we encountered in our material explorations with network technology, we would have still needed to go looking for trouble elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussion: the Trouble Is The Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, scholars have employed feminist standpoint theory [25] and theorizations of gender performativity [10] to counter traditional notions of objectivity, to demonstrate the value of marginalized positionalities in the field [8,14,27], and to address the need for critical reflexivity and attention to complex understandings of gender in digital and social media [44,53]. Feminist study of sociotechnical systems can be situated within a longer intellectual genealogy of critical work that has included the challenging of established identity models [21,24,26,32], defamiliarization of domestic technologies [3], adoption and appropriation of gender in IT [23], and the operationalization of intimacy and sexuality in HCI [31]. In general, these studies promote interrogation of power, gender, and inequity through reflexivity and the centering the socio-technical needs, desires, values and experiences of diverse users.…”
Section: Feminist Studies Of Socio-technical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%