1984
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(84)90355-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FePS3: A first-order phase transition in a “2D” Ising antiferromagnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
57
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
9
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of M for x = 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 decrease rapidly at respective T N . FePS 3 is known to have magnetic anisotropy due to the crystal electric field effect and the antiferromagnetic transition which is accompanied by the magnetoelastic effect [12,13]. The origin of rapid decrease at T N for x = 0.8 and 0.9 is also attributed to the same reason.…”
Section: Reentrant Spin Glassmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The values of M for x = 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0 decrease rapidly at respective T N . FePS 3 is known to have magnetic anisotropy due to the crystal electric field effect and the antiferromagnetic transition which is accompanied by the magnetoelastic effect [12,13]. The origin of rapid decrease at T N for x = 0.8 and 0.9 is also attributed to the same reason.…”
Section: Reentrant Spin Glassmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Allowing for inequivalent exchange interactions between equivalent neighbors might be a consideration. This may be justified as the magnetic phase transition is believed to be first order, with a concomitant distortion of the lattice at T N as observed in x-ray diffraction [18,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the van der Waals forces holding the layers of the host together are destroyed, 1,10-phenanthroline is much more easily inserted into the layers in a fast reaction, in which the guest is arranged perpendicular to the layer due to the restriction of limited interlayer space of the host (Eq. [4] in Fig. 4).…”
Section: Possible Intercalation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Equation [3]: the slower intercalation, in which the protonated 1,10-phenanthroline inserted into the layer to balance charge neutrality is arranged parallel to the layer of the host. Equation [4]: the faster intercalation, where the three phases coexist during the intercalation. Equation [5]: the orientation of the guest controlled by the amount of phenanthroline in the reaction, in which there was a reversible process: (a) molecular ring of phenanthroline is parallel to the layer of the host; (b) the parallel and perpendicular molecular rings of phenanthroline coexist; (c) the 1,10-phenanthroline ring was oriented so that the molecular twofold axis is perpendicular to the layer of the host.…”
Section: Possible Intercalation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%