2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.038102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtosecond-Laser-Induced Nanocavitation in Water: Implications for Optical Breakdown Threshold and Cell Surgery

Abstract: We determined the bubble radius R_(max) for femtosecond optical breakdown in water at 347, 520, and 1040 nm with an unprecedented accuracy (+/-10 nm). At threshold, R_(max) was smaller than the diffraction-limited focus radius and ranged from 190 nm to 320 nm. The increase of R_(max) with laser energy E_(L) is slowest at 347 nm, providing optimum control of cell surgery. Experimental results agree with a model of bubble formation in heated and thermoelastically stretched liquids. Theory predicts a threshold te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
244
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
17
244
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relation (2.5) together with (2.4) allows for a precise determination of R max with just a hydrophone (Hentschel & Lauterborn 1982;Vogel et al 1986;Vogel & Lauterborn 1988;Venugopalan et al 2002;Hutson & Ma 2007), without the need for high-speed photography, through the determination of T osc from the shock waves emitted at generation (time t g ) and at collapse (time t c ). Alternatively, T osc can be determined by detecting the deflection of a probe laser beam (Vogel et al 2008). This method works even for very small bubbles, for which acoustic transients cannot be detected.…”
Section: B Han and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relation (2.5) together with (2.4) allows for a precise determination of R max with just a hydrophone (Hentschel & Lauterborn 1982;Vogel et al 1986;Vogel & Lauterborn 1988;Venugopalan et al 2002;Hutson & Ma 2007), without the need for high-speed photography, through the determination of T osc from the shock waves emitted at generation (time t g ) and at collapse (time t c ). Alternatively, T osc can be determined by detecting the deflection of a probe laser beam (Vogel et al 2008). This method works even for very small bubbles, for which acoustic transients cannot be detected.…”
Section: B Han and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface tension, σ , produces a pressure 2σ /R scaling inversely proportional to the bubble radius, R, which adds to the hydrostatic pressure. A correction factor is presented by Vogel et al (2008). The relative initiation bubble distance, γ , is defined as…”
Section: B Han and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a near-infrared femtosecond laser is tightly focused in an aqueous solution under a microscope, shock and stress waves are generated at the laser focal point (4)(5)(6). These waves localize in a micrometer-sized space around the laser focal point (4) and they act as an impulsive force on a micrometer-sized object, such as a single cell, which is located near the laser focal point (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This oscillation transfers the kinetic energy associated with the bubble to intense shear, shock wave emissions, adiabatic heating and evaporation of the liquid at the focal volume. Experimentally upon the observation of the cavitation bubble it is predicted that the optical breakdown has occurred 14,15 . From the theoretical point of view, optical breakdown is achieved only when the free electron density number reaches the critical density number ~10 21 cm -3 .…”
Section: Figure 2 (A) Fsrs Signals At Different Input Energies (B) mentioning
confidence: 99%