2012
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182657591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femoral venous oxygen saturation is no surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation*

Abstract: There is lack of agreement between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in both stable and unstable medical conditions. Thus, femoral venous oxygen saturation should not be used as surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, only three papers dealt with the comparison between SfO 2 and SvcO 2 (Table 1). (2,3,21) A search was also conducted on the SciELO database with the keywords "femoral AND saturação (saturation)". No articles were found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, only three papers dealt with the comparison between SfO 2 and SvcO 2 (Table 1). (2,3,21) A search was also conducted on the SciELO database with the keywords "femoral AND saturação (saturation)". No articles were found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2,3) However, studies have demonstrated that there is a good correlation between SvcO 2 and SvO 2 and that they vary in parallel. (7-9) Compared to SvO 2 , therefore, the use of SvcO 2 is a faster and more practical alternative in tissue hypoperfusion monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study by van Beest et al (10) in this issue Critical Care Medicine clearly Is it not self-evident that all venous saturations are not created equal? * demonstrates that the inconsistent differences between SfO 2 and ScvO 2 are such that they cannot be substituted, one for the other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the van Beest et al (10) study, samples were from the femoral vein, well below where the renal blood admixture occurs. Despite this the results did not reliably reflect either the ScvO 2 or the SvŌ 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%