2016
DOI: 10.1177/0309132516677177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist geographies of digital work

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…sharing 'paths' with friends through Smart Journal); and discover social media tags descriptive of feelings about or experiences of locational content. This user-generated content reveals a little about the cultural economy within which tech cities operate (Fuchs, 2017), but we remain outside the intimacies of labour, inattentive to the professional structures and enduring discrimination (Banks and Milestone, 2011;Richardson, 2018), and unaware of the configurations of gender division (Reimer, 2016).…”
Section: Writing About the Impact Of New Technologies And Spatial Infmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sharing 'paths' with friends through Smart Journal); and discover social media tags descriptive of feelings about or experiences of locational content. This user-generated content reveals a little about the cultural economy within which tech cities operate (Fuchs, 2017), but we remain outside the intimacies of labour, inattentive to the professional structures and enduring discrimination (Banks and Milestone, 2011;Richardson, 2018), and unaware of the configurations of gender division (Reimer, 2016).…”
Section: Writing About the Impact Of New Technologies And Spatial Infmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographies of digital skill outlined in this paper raise several further areas of interest regarding the intersections of labour, life and digital technologies (Richardson 2016(Richardson , 2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The role of information technology in workplace wellbeing is often portrayed negatively, as constant communication pressuring us to be always on duty, or as institutional online spaces exhorting selfcare. 46 But when digital technology disrupts 'at work' spaces, 47 the results are not wholly negative. The positive counter-balance is their potential as safe, supportive online gathering spaces.…”
Section: Why We Seek Safe Online Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 In digital space we maintain regular interactions facilitated by physical spaces despite moving apart physically. This offers particular forms of intimacy, 76 as OSNs encourage frequent discussion in which thoughts, emotions and jokes are easily shared. A trusted group of peers, available 'anywhere' provide invaluable support.…”
Section: The Place Of Online Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%