Encyclopedia of Motherhood 2010
DOI: 10.4135/9781412979276.n204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminism and Mothering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women without MS have demonstrated resistance to idealised discourses of motherhood by positioning such ideals as problematic and unrealistic (Frizelle & Hayes, 1999), normalising the challenges of motherhood, and engagement in self-care (Cusk, 2001; Wolf, 2001). Women’s “counter-stories” (McKenzie-Mohr & Lafrance, 2014) offer alternative representations of mothering, through art, poetry, and memoir (Kinser, 2008). However, resistance to idealised discourses of motherhood in the present study was mostly positioned as a response to the material and intrapsychic consequences of MS, associated with negative self-evaluation as mothers and fear of emotionally damaging their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women without MS have demonstrated resistance to idealised discourses of motherhood by positioning such ideals as problematic and unrealistic (Frizelle & Hayes, 1999), normalising the challenges of motherhood, and engagement in self-care (Cusk, 2001; Wolf, 2001). Women’s “counter-stories” (McKenzie-Mohr & Lafrance, 2014) offer alternative representations of mothering, through art, poetry, and memoir (Kinser, 2008). However, resistance to idealised discourses of motherhood in the present study was mostly positioned as a response to the material and intrapsychic consequences of MS, associated with negative self-evaluation as mothers and fear of emotionally damaging their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist research problematizes motherhood as ‘natural’, or as a biological calling to women, and views it as a gendered and cultural construct (e.g. Butler, 1989; Kinser, 2010). Specifically, feminist motherhood research suggests that western motherhood is largely shaped by heterosexual nuclear family ideals and a striving to simultaneously perform different successful femininities (De Benedictis and Orgad, 2017); motherhood ‘subsumes assimilated cultural awareness of how a mother ought to act’ (Krok, 2009: 10; see also McRobbie, 2013, 2015).…”
Section: Messy and Fleshy Maternal Experiences In The ‘New’ Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of performing the cultural expectations of the ‘good’ mother was by challenging the normative spaces of motherhood (compare Säilävaara, 2016) and creating paths to ‘new’ motherhood by keeping everyday life with the baby busy outside the home, as the following autoethnographic note reveals. At the same time, this performance could be seen as another way of ‘professionalizing’ motherhood in the context of a high-achieving culture (Kinser, 2010): I do a lot of things with my baby; during the weekdays we go dancing, singing, and ‘color bathing’ with other babies, and swimming (and diving) every Saturday morning. Sometimes I feel I am ‘performing’ my motherhood as perfectly as I can by offering as many experiences to my baby as possible.…”
Section: Negotiating Maternal Tensions Within the ‘New’ Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning needs to respond to how broader ‘…categories of experience and social status cannot be understood separately from each other because they have a combined effect. People do not face identical obstacles simply because they share a single social status’(Kinser, 2010, p. 24). Planning should be based in theoretical work by Kimberlé Crenshaw and others to advance policy responses that address how inequalities intersect and cause discrimination, exclusion and harms for distinctive demographics of women and children (Crenshaw, 1993; Hankivsky et al, 2012; Singh, 2017).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Comments On Implications Going Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diverse response to women and girls’ experiences of armed conflict that ignores these realities ultimately fails those women and girls affected. If ‘[b]eing able to decide if and when she wants to become a mother is a critical starting place for [women’s] power’ (Kinser, 2010), then ensuring women have ability to make choices over sexualities, sexual practices and reproduction is a critical part of the WPS agenda (Hagen, 2016; Mertens & Myrttinen, 2019). Its implementation should address the complexities of motherhood, maternity, reproduction and the challenges facing CBW as an opportunity for expanding the boundaries of gendered understanding of armed conflict currently delimiting that agenda.…”
Section: The Gendered Harms Of Warfare: ‘Prickly’ Conundrums Confrontmentioning
confidence: 99%