Feminine style in presidential debate discourse, 1960–2000

The Intersection Between Deep Moral Frames and Rhetorical Style in the Struggle over U.S. Immigration Reform

“…Unlike previous examinations of contemporary political rhetoric that have generally uncovered discourse utilizing either a feminine style or some combination of masculine and feminine styles (e.g., Blankenship & Robson, 1995;DeRosa & Bystrom, 1999;Johnson, 2005;Kimble, 2009;Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles, 1996), our textual analysis uncovered few traces of feminine language use. Instead, policymakers and political commentators relied heavily on masculinely styled rhetoric; they projected an authoritative voice through declarative, data-driven arguments.…”

“…, political movements (Hayden, 2003;Peeples & DeLuca, 2006;Tonn, 1996), Congressional policymaking (Blankenship & Robson, 1995), political debates (Banwart & McKinney, 2005;Johnson, 2005), convention speeches (DeRosa & Bystrom, 1999), and presidential campaign films (Parry-Giles & Parry-Giles, 1996. Understanding how political communication operates in American democracy demands an appreciation of how gender and style play out in our political process.…”

Caracterización del ejercicio periodístico en los debates presidenciales chilenos: una comparación entre mujeres y hombres en su rol como entrevistadores

“…Entre las investigaciones que existen sobre la presencia de mujeres en debates electorales, la gran mayoría se enmarca en el halo de trabajos más complejos, donde el foco está en su participación política o en la cobertura que reciben; enfatizando que las mujeres cuentan con más filtros que los hombres, y que la cobertura política tiende a marginar a las mujeres cuando no se ajustan a las normas masculinas tradicionales presentes en la arena política (Meeks, 2013citado por Rodelo, 2016. Así, la mayoría de los estudios sobre debates televisados bajo un enfoque de género son sobre las candidatas y los tipos de discursos que utilizan (Johnson, 2005), el carácter de la comunicación con la que se presentan -es decir, si son femeninos o masculinos-(Grebelsky-Lichtmana & Kast, 2018), los tipos de performances con que se desenvuelven (Greenwood & Coker, 2017) y las estrategias a las que recurren (McKinney & Banwart, 2005;Maier & Renner, 2018).…”

The power of persuasion: Modality and issue framing in the 2012 Taiwan Presidential Debates

“…Benoit and many researchers conduct analysis using the functional approach (Benoit, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2007a, 2007b). Other researchers examine specific issues such as agenda, frames and public opinion (Boydstun et al, 2013; Fridkin et al, 2007; Kenski and Jamieson, 2006; Olson, 2013), politeness strategies (Dailey et al, 2008; Hinck and Hinck, 2002), survey and voting research (Kenski and Jamieson, 2011; Prior, 2012), television viewing, issue knowledge and perceptions (Brubaken and Hanson, 2009; Kenski and Jamieson, 2006; Kenski and Stroud, 2005; McKinney et al, 2011; Warner, 2011; Warner et al, 2011), voters’ attitudes (Yawn et al, 1998), effects on citizens’ engagement (Cho and Ha, 2012; McKinney and Rill, 2009; Ricke, 2010), feminine style (Johnson, 2005) and hedge, humour, political satire and laughter (Alavi-Nia and Jalilifar, 2013; Duffy and Page, 2013; Kugler and Goethals, 2008; Stewart, 2010, 2012).…”