2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female urogenital chlamydia: Epidemiology, chlamydia on pregnancy, current diagnosis, and treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epidemiological and clinical data on chlamydial infection rates are difficult to ascertain due to limitations in screening and reporting of infections. Massive screening measures have not been implemented worldwide (mainly in developing countries), contributing to inaccuracies when estimating and calculating prevalence and incidence rates [ 10 ]. Furthermore, asymptomatic individuals unknowingly spread the disease to their sexual partners, and, despite treatment, reinfection is common [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epidemiological and clinical data on chlamydial infection rates are difficult to ascertain due to limitations in screening and reporting of infections. Massive screening measures have not been implemented worldwide (mainly in developing countries), contributing to inaccuracies when estimating and calculating prevalence and incidence rates [ 10 ]. Furthermore, asymptomatic individuals unknowingly spread the disease to their sexual partners, and, despite treatment, reinfection is common [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, asymptomatic individuals unknowingly spread the disease to their sexual partners, and, despite treatment, reinfection is common [ 11 ]. It is estimated that about 75% of women and 50% of men are asymptomatic [ 10 ]. Under these circumstances, obtaining reliable data regarding infection rates is difficult, and prevalence rates are presumably higher than what is recorded in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%