2010
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.100232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Sex Pheromone ofGlossosphecia romanovi(Lepidoptera: Sesiidae): Identification and Field Attraction

Abstract: In field screening tests of synthetic pheromone candidates for Japanese sesiid species, a mixture of (3Z,13Z)-octadecadien-1-ol and (3Z,13Z)-octadecadienyl acetate successfully attracted male moths of Glossosphecia romanovi, a harmful pest of vine trees. The GC-EAD and GC-MS analyses of the pheromone gland extract revealed that the female moths produced the alcohol and acetate in a ratio of about 20:1, in addition to three other minor structure-related components.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arakawa et al (2009) recently identified Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH, Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc, and E 3, Z 13‐18:OH in the gland extracts of female G. romanovi from Japan and found that an 8:1:1 blend of Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH, Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc, and E 3, Z 13‐18:OH was more attractive to male moths than a binary blend of Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH and Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc (8:1). A later study revealed that addition of E 3, Z 13‐18:OH, E 3, Z 13‐18:OAc, and Z 13‐18:OH at levels found in the female glands does not affect captures of Japanese males to the primary binary blend of Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH and Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc (20:1) (Naka et al, 2010), which is contrary to the results of Arakawa et al (2009). These results indicate that variation in male responses to E 3, Z 13‐18:OH is evident between Korean and Japanese populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arakawa et al (2009) recently identified Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH, Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc, and E 3, Z 13‐18:OH in the gland extracts of female G. romanovi from Japan and found that an 8:1:1 blend of Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH, Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc, and E 3, Z 13‐18:OH was more attractive to male moths than a binary blend of Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH and Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc (8:1). A later study revealed that addition of E 3, Z 13‐18:OH, E 3, Z 13‐18:OAc, and Z 13‐18:OH at levels found in the female glands does not affect captures of Japanese males to the primary binary blend of Z 3, Z 13‐18:OH and Z 3, Z 13‐18:OAc (20:1) (Naka et al, 2010), which is contrary to the results of Arakawa et al (2009). These results indicate that variation in male responses to E 3, Z 13‐18:OH is evident between Korean and Japanese populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on the sex pheromone of N. granella have shown that it can be effectively used to control pests through mating disruption in ham factories (Savoldelli et al, 2023). Z3Z13- Karalius et al, 2005) Cowles et al, 1996;Francke et al, 2004;Guangzhong et al, 1990;Kovalev et al, 1988;Mozūraitis & Karalius, 2007;Naka et al, 2006Naka et al, , 2010Underhill et al, 1978;Vickers & Rumbo, 2001;Yang et al, 2009Yang et al, , 2012Yang, Cho, & Choi, 2011;Yang, Kim, & Lee, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is notable because, like nocturnal moths, A. fortunei males mainly use a sex pheromone to recognize their mating partner, irrespective of their diurnal life history. Similarly, the males of some diurnal moths are attracted by sex pheromones emitted by females (Yasui et al 2005;Naka et al 2006Naka et al , 2007Naka et al , 2008Naka et al , 2010Toshova et al 2007), with one exception (Sarto i Monteys et al 2012) where the female sex pheromone seems secondary lost. These results suggest that (1) ancestor species of diurnal moths may be nocturnal and use female sex pheromones for mate recognition, and their diurnal life history may have evolved after the evolution of the sex pheromone, and (2) sufficient visual resolution ability as is apparent in diurnal butterflies would not have developed in diurnal moths due to phylogenetic constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%