2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female age affects the utility of sperm DNA fragmentation in predicting IVF and ICSI outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are comparable with previous studies. We found that females who achieved pregnancy were younger and these results are similar to the results of Liang et al (21), who reported that female age is a predictor for successful pregnancy after IVF. In 2018 Pacey et al (22) concluded, after reviewing nine meta-analyses that evaluated DFI and pregnancy, that there remains little consensus about the use of DFI and whether it adds clinical value.…”
Section: Characteristicsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings are comparable with previous studies. We found that females who achieved pregnancy were younger and these results are similar to the results of Liang et al (21), who reported that female age is a predictor for successful pregnancy after IVF. In 2018 Pacey et al (22) concluded, after reviewing nine meta-analyses that evaluated DFI and pregnancy, that there remains little consensus about the use of DFI and whether it adds clinical value.…”
Section: Characteristicsupporting
confidence: 91%
“… 29 Similarly, the study by Liang et al revealed that when female age was older than 30 years, women with DFI >30% had lower clinical pregnancy rates and fewer good-quality embryos than women with DFI ≤30%. 41 In our study, the multivariate analysis indicated that female age and female abnormal BMI increased the risk of EPL in IVF cycles by 5.87 times (p=0.005) and 4.18 times (p=0.004), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value;Zini & Sigman, 2009). The predictive power of SDF tests is influenced by type (SS-DB or DS-DB), site (intron or exons) and amount of damage in each cell, as well as the number of affected cells and the oocyte′s ability to repair SDF after fertilisation(Esteves, 2020;Jin et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2019;Sakkas & Alvarez, 2010). It seems plausible that different assays might be complementing each other in different clinical settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%