2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FEM analysis of ultrasonic-vibration-assisted turning and the vibratory tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the structure of the fixture, two nodes are available for holding the tool. To obtain the mentioned characteristics, the tool was designed and analyzed using finite element modal analysis inspired from the work of Amini et al (2008). After delicate design, the length of the cutting tool was calculated 122 mm, and its cross section was 30 mm × 30 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the structure of the fixture, two nodes are available for holding the tool. To obtain the mentioned characteristics, the tool was designed and analyzed using finite element modal analysis inspired from the work of Amini et al (2008). After delicate design, the length of the cutting tool was calculated 122 mm, and its cross section was 30 mm × 30 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral overlap between beads is 25%. Physical and thermomechanical properties of IN738 (Sciti et al, 2001;Aminia et al, 2008;Quested et al, 2009). …”
Section: Modeled Conditions and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, three main modelling techniques are usually employed to simulate material removal: element deletion [29,38], arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian adaptive remeshing (ALE) [18,20,39] and smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [27,40,41]. Our studies indicated that the three modelling techniques produce almost identical results for the cutting forces, however, the element deletion technique was the most computationally efficient [42].…”
Section: Modelling Of Materials Removalmentioning
confidence: 92%