2004
DOI: 10.1112/s002557930001559x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fell continuous selections and topologically well‐orderable spaces

Abstract: Abstract. The present paper improves a result of [3] by showing that a space X is topologically well-orderable if and only if there exists a selection for F2(X) which is continuous with respect to the Fell topology on F2(X). In particular, this implies that F(X) has a Fell-continuous selection if and only if F2(X) has a Fell-continuous selection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, X is an ordinal space if it is an ordinal equipped with the open interval topology. For some related results in the non-compact case, the interested reader is referred to [3,4,20,29,43]. The proof of Corollary 3.9 implies the following more restrictive property on the continuous selections for F (X).…”
Section: Extension Of Selections and Discrete Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, X is an ordinal space if it is an ordinal equipped with the open interval topology. For some related results in the non-compact case, the interested reader is referred to [3,4,20,29,43]. The proof of Corollary 3.9 implies the following more restrictive property on the continuous selections for F (X).…”
Section: Extension Of Selections and Discrete Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, let us recall that a point p ∈ X of a connected space X is cut if X \ {p} is not connected or, equivalently, if X \ {p} = U ∪ V for some subsets U, V ⊂ X with U ∩ V = {p}. Extending this interpretation to an arbitrary space X, a point p ∈ X was said to be cut [14], see also [6,13], if X \ {p} = U ∪ V and U ∩ V = {p} for some subsets U, V ⊂ X. Cut points were also introduced in [3], where they were called tie-points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, relying on the technique developed in [8], we extend this result to arbitrary scattered spaces in the following way:…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that such sets U and V must be open because U = X \ V and V = X \ U . A concept similar to this played an important role for first countability of spaces X with se [F (X)] = ∅, see [8,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%