2013
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding strategy of juvenile (age‐0+ year) Argentine hakeMerluccius hubbsiin the Patagonian nursery ground

Abstract: Age-0+ year juvenile Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi (60-150 mm total length, L(T)) from San Jorge Gulf, north Patagonian shelf region of the Argentine Sea, had an almost exclusively pelagic diet dominated by the hyperiid amphipod Themisto gaudichaudii and the euphausiid Euphausia lucens. This suggested that final settlement and permanent demersal habitat utilization might not, as previously reported, occur at earlier sizes (c. 20 mm L(T)). Their feeding strategy involves specialization at a population level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that this distribution might respond to certain temperature and salinity ranges as well as to zooplankton prey concentrations (Louge et al, 2011). Pre-recruits prey mainly upon euphausiids and amphipods during austral summer, although decapods are included in the diet in a lower proportion (Temperoni et al, 2013). However, the spatial variability of these macrozooplankton prey within the SJG is poorly known (Pérez Seijas et al, 1987;Viñas et al, 1992 2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that this distribution might respond to certain temperature and salinity ranges as well as to zooplankton prey concentrations (Louge et al, 2011). Pre-recruits prey mainly upon euphausiids and amphipods during austral summer, although decapods are included in the diet in a lower proportion (Temperoni et al, 2013). However, the spatial variability of these macrozooplankton prey within the SJG is poorly known (Pérez Seijas et al, 1987;Viñas et al, 1992 2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult M. hubbsi feed primarily on pelagic crustaceans, squid, and fish such as anchovy, whereas young larvae prey on zooplankton, incorporating mainly copepods <2 mm in length. Young juveniles incorporate larger zooplankton, mostly the euphausiid Euphausia lucens and the amphipod Themisto gaudichaudii (Viñas & Santos, 2000;Temperoni, Viñas, & Buratti, 2013). Another important factor for fish that are commercially exploited is fishing pressure, which can influence recruitment indirectly by altering the stock reproductive potential and the abundance of spawning individuals, or directly by affecting the abundance of juveniles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, pelagic YOY hakes were found distributed closer to the bottom during the warm season (10.9 m) than during the cold season (14.1 m), with reduced mean densities, probably given to natural mortality and progressive recruitment to the demersal habitat. The main prey found in the diet of the Argentine hake M. hubbsi off SJG in south‐western Atlantic were in accordance with those reported previously (Belleggia et al ., 2014; Belleggia et al ., 2017; Belleggia et al ., 2019; Ruiz & Fondacaro, 1997; Sánchez, 2009; Sánchez & García de la Rosa, 1999; Sánchez & Prenski, 1996; Temperoni et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digitized acoustic data were recorded with the BEI software (Bergen Echo Integrator; Foote et al ., 1991) and processed with the Echoview 4.1 software. The frequency response and target strength distributions of the acoustic echo traces were used to scrutinize and in the interpretation of echograms, with further validation from the catches of pelagic net trawls, the specific composition of the stomach contents of the juvenile hake caught, as well as previous experience on the pelagic distribution of juvenile hake and macro‐zooplankton (Álvarez‐Colombo, 2013; Álvarez‐Colombo et al ., 2014; Belleggia et al ., 2019; Cabreira et al ., 2011; Padovani et al ., 2015; Sabatini & Alvarez‐Colombo, 2001; Temperoni et al ., 2013). The echograms, often showing mixed juvenile hake and macro‐zooplankton distributions, were classified based on the frequency dependence of the acoustic targets, in terms of relative frequency response (r f ) or dB‐difference (Brierley & Watkins, 1996; Everson et al ., 1993; Korneliussen, 2018; Korneliussen & Ona, 2002; Madureira et al ., 1993; McQuinn et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation