1976
DOI: 10.4039/ent1081207-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FEEDING HABITS AND FOOD PREFERENCES OF MELANOPLUS BIVITTATUS AND M. FEMURRUBRUM (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE)

Abstract: The feeding habits of Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) and M. femurrubrum (DeGeer) in an Ontario grassland were investigated by analyzing crop contents. The study revealed that both species are mixed feeders which prefer forbs over grasses. Both species ingested a wide range of host plants in the field, showing preferences for some species over others. Differential growth and mortality resulted when grasshoppers were reared on different host plants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C. solstitialis, although accepted by grasshoppers in the laboratory in no-choice tests, suffered almost no damage in the common-garden experiment, followed by C. maculosa and C. diffusa. The discrepancy in the acceptability of C. solstitialis in the laboratory and the damage to this species in the field, where M. femurrubrum was the dominant herbivore, was likely due to the availability of alternative, more-acceptable food plants in the garden, such as goldenrods and grasses (Bailey and Mukerji 1976). In addition, using cut leaves in the laboratory tests may have precluded the production of defensive chemicals in C. solstitialis that were present in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C. solstitialis, although accepted by grasshoppers in the laboratory in no-choice tests, suffered almost no damage in the common-garden experiment, followed by C. maculosa and C. diffusa. The discrepancy in the acceptability of C. solstitialis in the laboratory and the damage to this species in the field, where M. femurrubrum was the dominant herbivore, was likely due to the availability of alternative, more-acceptable food plants in the garden, such as goldenrods and grasses (Bailey and Mukerji 1976). In addition, using cut leaves in the laboratory tests may have precluded the production of defensive chemicals in C. solstitialis that were present in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments considered primarily the response of generalist herbivores to invasive and non-invasive exotics. Both grasshopper species we used in the feeding trials readily accept a wide range of host plants from several families, although they do display feeding preferences (Bernays et al 1997;Bailey and Mukerji 1976). Neither model herbivore can be considered naïve to the exotic plants we presented to them, as the plant and grasshopper ranges show substantial overlap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high mobility of the black field crickets enables movement among a range of different plant species in the field from which they are able to select preferred species. The advantages to the black field cricket of feeding on favoured plant species might be similar to those found for other orthopterans -increased feeding, adult weight, egg production, survival, development, and reduced activity and mobility (Chapman 1957;Mulkern & Toczek 1970;Bailey & Mukerji 1976;McCaffery 1976). The reason for the differential effects of various host plants on growth and development is believed to be related to the nutritional qualities of individual plant species (Bailey & Mukerji 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…1969;Abushama & Elkhider 1976;Bailey & Mukerji 1976). The high mobility of the black field crickets enables movement among a range of different plant species in the field from which they are able to select preferred species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in another test M. differentialis preferred giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. (Asteraceae), over sunflower (Lewis 1984). Host preference has also been shown with other Melanoplus species (Bailey & Mukerji 1976;Fielding & Brusven 1992;Hinks et al 1990;Hinks & Olfert 1993;Johnson & Mündel 1987;Porter & Redak 1997). Damage to seedlings in a pine nursery was reported by Feaver (1985), but no other literature on the preferences of M. differentialis for either turfgrasses or landscape plants has been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%