1974
DOI: 10.1139/f74-040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding by Alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) on Larval Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) in the Laboratory

Abstract: Adult alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) from Lake Michigan readily ate larval lake white-fish (Coregonus clupeaformis) of 16.3 mm (standard deviation 1.4 mm) average length in the laboratory. They ignored the larvae when the latter had grown to 19.5 mm (SD = 1.6 mm) and 24.9 mm (SD = 3.2 mm) average length.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Year-class strength of fish, and thus stock size, is determined during early life stages (May 1974;Salojärvi 1991). Several factors are known to influence survival and thus the success of the coregonid larvae stocked: When artificial reproduction is practiced, rearing conditions and size at the time of stocking are important (Hoagman 1974;Flü chter 1980;Taylor and Freeberg 1984;Urban-Jezierska and Biernacki 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Year-class strength of fish, and thus stock size, is determined during early life stages (May 1974;Salojärvi 1991). Several factors are known to influence survival and thus the success of the coregonid larvae stocked: When artificial reproduction is practiced, rearing conditions and size at the time of stocking are important (Hoagman 1974;Flü chter 1980;Taylor and Freeberg 1984;Urban-Jezierska and Biernacki 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All available data pointed to several successive year-class failures as the primary cause of the recent decline, and the year-classes appeared to be failing during the first few months of life (Francis et al 1996). We hypothesized that alewives Alosa pseudoharengus suppressed yellow perch recruitment because the alewife is a potentially important predator or competitor of larval fish, including yellow perch (Smith 1970;Hoagman 1974;Rhodes et al 1974;Crowder 1980;Kohler and Ney 1980;Jude and Tesar 1985;Brandt et al 1987;Crowder et al 1987;Luecke et al 1990;Krueger et al 1995;Mason and Brandt 1996;Brooking et al 1998), and because the introduction and population expansion of the alewife in Lake Michigan has previously been implicated in declines of yellow perch and other indigenous species (Smith 1970;Wells 1977;Wells and Jorgenson 1983;Jude and Tesar 1985;Eck and Wells 1987). We examined the relationship between the abundance of alewives age-1 and older and yellow perch recruitment in Indiana waters of Lake Michigan to determine if the two were inversely related.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, predation could regulate bloater recruitment under three different scenarios. First, nonindigenous adult alewives Alosa pseudoharengus are effective predators of fish larvae (Hoagman 1974;Rice et al 1987a;Krueger et al 1995), and when bloater recruitment in the late 1970s began increasing while alewife densities declined, some hypothesised that predation by adult alewife on bloater larvae had been a recruitment bottleneck (e.g., Eck & Wells 1987). More recent studies, however, have discounted this hypothesis given the limited spatiotemporal overlap between adult alewife and pelagic bloater larvae ) and the lack of explanatory power of adult alewife in bloater recruitment models (Bunnell et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%