1985
DOI: 10.1300/j075v07n03_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback: Use and Possible Behavioral Functions

Abstract: Concepts, definitions and information feedback practices are discussed and illustrated from both a "traditional" Industrial/Organizational perspective and an Organizational Behavior Management perspective. A strategy for organizing feedback is proposed which incorporates both dimensions of feedback and the behavioral functions by which feedback operates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feedback as a term can describe a vast array of procedures and methods (Ford, 1980 (Duncan & Bruwelheide, 1986). A reinforcement function of feedback would be inferred if feedback is delivered following a performance and performance improves as a result (e.g., Prue & Fairbank, 1981).…”
Section: Performance Feedback and Rule-governed Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feedback as a term can describe a vast array of procedures and methods (Ford, 1980 (Duncan & Bruwelheide, 1986). A reinforcement function of feedback would be inferred if feedback is delivered following a performance and performance improves as a result (e.g., Prue & Fairbank, 1981).…”
Section: Performance Feedback and Rule-governed Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from a discriminatory function, a second antecedent function that feedback may serve is as an establishing operation. Duncan and Bruwelheide (1986) propose that feedback may alter the value of behaviors and outcomes by providing a description of a relation to obtaining other reinforcers.…”
Section: Performance Feedback and Rule-governed Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervisory feedback has been preferred over feedback from other sources, because supervisory feedback of course informs the supervisor of employee performance, and because supervisors control many of the consequences that are important to employees (Daniels, 1989). It has been suggested that supervisory feedback may have direct reinforcing consequences (Komaki et al, 1978), may function as an establishing operation, or have reinforcing consequences because of an association with other reinforcers (Agnew 1998;Duncan, & Bruwelheide, 1985). If the supervisor controls reinforcers such as work scheduling, raises and promotions, positive supervisory feedback can become effective as a conditioned reinforcer.…”
Section: John Austin Brent Helton and Sigurdur Oli Sigurdsson Westementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have pointed out that feedback procedures are implemented in a manner that is analogous to reinforcement (or punishment) procedures (e.g., Duncan andBruwelheide 1985-1986;Peterson 1982). Most notably, under both feedback and operant procedures, consequences of responding are contingent on properties of responding.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Feedback With Reinforcement and Punishment Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, control system models hold that feedback stimuli provide information about current performance that is compared by the learner with preestablished goals or other standards for performance. Discrepancies result in adjustment of performance or goals (for a description of this model, see Duncan andBruwelheide 1985-1986). Under control system models, a priori establishment of feedback stimulus effectiveness would amount to determining that stimuli accurately indicate the relation between current behavior and performance goals or standards.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Feedback With Reinforcement and Punishment Pmentioning
confidence: 99%