2017
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2016.2612622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback Linearization and Extended State Observer-Based Control for Rotor-AMBs System With Mismatched Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several examples of those applications are the following: [38] where the authors use feedback linearization with linear-quadratic regulator to control Stewart robot; [22,24] where feedback linearization in combination with sliding mode control is used to control induction motor drives; or [34] where, for spring loaded inverted pendulum as a model for legged locomotion, the authors use partial feedback linearization. Additionally, feedback linearization is applied also when the problem of uncertainties occurs, as in [43] where the authors consider control of nonlinear hydraulic generator with external disturbances and system uncertainty; in [25] where feedback linearization and extended state observer based control is proposed that deals with uncertainties of rotor-active magnetic bearings system; or in [46] where a neural network-based supple-mentary control system for a nonlinear plant is build on the basis of feedback linearization. The feedback linearization method is also still developed, as in [23], where the authors propose the variant of the method for systems with time varying delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several examples of those applications are the following: [38] where the authors use feedback linearization with linear-quadratic regulator to control Stewart robot; [22,24] where feedback linearization in combination with sliding mode control is used to control induction motor drives; or [34] where, for spring loaded inverted pendulum as a model for legged locomotion, the authors use partial feedback linearization. Additionally, feedback linearization is applied also when the problem of uncertainties occurs, as in [43] where the authors consider control of nonlinear hydraulic generator with external disturbances and system uncertainty; in [25] where feedback linearization and extended state observer based control is proposed that deals with uncertainties of rotor-active magnetic bearings system; or in [46] where a neural network-based supple-mentary control system for a nonlinear plant is build on the basis of feedback linearization. The feedback linearization method is also still developed, as in [23], where the authors propose the variant of the method for systems with time varying delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the simulation results show the effectiveness, robustness, and good adaptability of the designed controller. The proposed design idea of reducing the tracking error can be extended to the tracking control of other types of systems [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] to improve the tracking accuracy and disturbance rejection performance of the controller.…”
Section: A Novel Robust Tracking Control Approach Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the gain settings of the LESO in many other types of control systems, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] the LESO with fixed preset observation gains is used in the tracking control of the antagonistic VSA based on ENTS. 40 However, the LESO with fixed preset observation gains always has estimation errors, especially when the reference trajectories change abruptly (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain a good dynamic process and noise suppression capability, the characteristic equation is set as shown in the following equation, where λ q and λ k are both negative values. Their values can be selected using the bandwidth concept [38].…”
Section: The Linear Extended State Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%