2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federated learning of predictive models from federated Electronic Health Records

Abstract: We test cPDS on the problem of predicting hospitalizations due to heart diseases within a calendar year based on information in the patients Electronic Health Records prior to that year. cPDS converges faster than centralized methods at the cost of some communication between agents. It also converges faster and with less communication overhead compared to an alternative distributed algorithm. In both cases, it achieves similar prediction accuracy measured by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
318
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 618 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
318
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many models have been used to predict a patient admission to a hospital, mortality and other health care applications based on comorbidities. Some examples include: predicting morbidity of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [6], febrile neutropenia [7], as well as classifying the hospitalization of patients with preconditions on diabetes [8], heart disease [9,10], and hospital readmission for patients with mental or substance use disorders [11]. Recent advances in the machine learning literature have suggested that sparse classifiers, those that use few variables (e.g., l1-regularized Support Vector Machines), have stronger predictive power and generalize better on out-of-sample data points than very complex classifiers [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models have been used to predict a patient admission to a hospital, mortality and other health care applications based on comorbidities. Some examples include: predicting morbidity of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [6], febrile neutropenia [7], as well as classifying the hospitalization of patients with preconditions on diabetes [8], heart disease [9,10], and hospital readmission for patients with mental or substance use disorders [11]. Recent advances in the machine learning literature have suggested that sparse classifiers, those that use few variables (e.g., l1-regularized Support Vector Machines), have stronger predictive power and generalize better on out-of-sample data points than very complex classifiers [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We envision that different groups and institutions will have their own local version of the CKG, protecting the sensitive nature of healthcare data, but in a way that still enables cross-platform analyses. New approaches, such as differential privacy and federated learning (Bonawitz et al, 2019;Brisimi et al, 2018), would allow researchers to use the CKG to train models iteratively across institutions without direct access to the sensitive data ( Figure 7C). The CKG could also integrate with existing standardized health data warehouse solutions, such as i2b2 and OMOP (Boussadi and Zapletal, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the training model is brought to the data, rather than the data to the model. There are recent applications, sharing electronic health records, without revealing their sensitive content [12]. While federated learning addresses privacy concerns related to data sharing, it introduces threats to the transparency in the learning process, which is another key aspect of automated decision making.…”
Section: Background -Commercial Openness and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%