2023
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3167256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federated Learning for IoMT Applications: A Standardization and Benchmarking Framework of Intrusion Detection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When choosing a platform [27], it can be essential to consider one that's open and flexible enough to support a security program as it changes. Consider whether it offers Open standards, Open-source technology, or Open connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When choosing a platform [27], it can be essential to consider one that's open and flexible enough to support a security program as it changes. Consider whether it offers Open standards, Open-source technology, or Open connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open platform connects to third-party tools and supports custom connections and development. As per [27], this approach can help reduce vendor lock-in and promote interoperability with multiple security and Information Technology (IT) tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weighting criteria can be done objectively or subjectively 32–48 . In objective weighting methods such as entropy, the criterion importance is computed using raw data; in this case, changes in the raw data affect the weight value's accuracy 49–52 . Moreover, subjective weighting methods reflect the subjective judgement of the decision‐makers/experts 53 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] In objective weighting methods such as entropy, the criterion importance is computed using raw data; in this case, changes in the raw data affect the weight value's accuracy. [49][50][51][52] Moreover, subjective weighting methods reflect the subjective judgement of the decision-makers/experts. 53 Numerous subjective weighting methods have been proposed; however, when it comes to weighting criteria, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) 54 and best-worst method (BWM) 55 methods have a high success rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of research is most suited for this case study, because it deals with the main issues, such as the availability of many criteria (each disease has its own criteria), trade-offs and data variation [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Addressing all these issues requires a robust MCDM method [21,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. An examination of the literature shows that various techniques were proposed, and many of them are unique [23,24,[45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%