2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2361017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federal Directives, Local Discretion and the Majority Rule

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative, political-economy, approach to some of the questions in this paper has been taken by Lockwood (2002), Besley and Coate (2003), Loeper (2013), and others. These papers present models where the central authority's decisions do not aim to be welfare maximizing, but rather are the outcome of an explicit voting or legislative decision-making process.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative, political-economy, approach to some of the questions in this paper has been taken by Lockwood (2002), Besley and Coate (2003), Loeper (2013), and others. These papers present models where the central authority's decisions do not aim to be welfare maximizing, but rather are the outcome of an explicit voting or legislative decision-making process.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%