2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1029176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal indicators and antibiotic resistance genes exhibit diurnal trends in the Chattahoochee River: Implications for water quality monitoring

Abstract: Water bodies that serve as sources of drinking or recreational water are routinely monitored for fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) by state and local agencies. Exceedances of monitoring thresholds set by those agencies signal likely elevated human health risk from exposure, but FIB give little information about the potential source of contamination. To improve our understanding of how within-day variation could impact monitoring data interpretation, we conducted a study at two sites along the Chattahoochee River … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fecal pollution could originate from human diffuse pollution as well as wildlife and farming activities, which may account for the higher levels of EC and SOMCPH with respect to CrAssPH, which has been reported as a potential human source tracking marker [47]. The concentrations of these indicators are similar to those reported in previous works for similar streams [48][49][50]. The low levels of Indicators detected at this site are consistent with low levels of fecal pollution in the river.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Fecal Indicators Along the Riversupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This fecal pollution could originate from human diffuse pollution as well as wildlife and farming activities, which may account for the higher levels of EC and SOMCPH with respect to CrAssPH, which has been reported as a potential human source tracking marker [47]. The concentrations of these indicators are similar to those reported in previous works for similar streams [48][49][50]. The low levels of Indicators detected at this site are consistent with low levels of fecal pollution in the river.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Fecal Indicators Along the Riversupporting
confidence: 87%