2021
DOI: 10.4149/neo_2021_201230n1426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features and impacts on the prognosis of gene mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract: To explore features and impacts on the prognosis of common gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we assessed mutated status as well as variant allele frequency (VAF) of 24 genes in 81 AML patients by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Eighty-six percentages of patients showed at least one mutation. Mutation in BCOR was associated with lower complete remission (CR) rate, whereas double mutation in CEBPA was associated with a favorable odds ratio for CR achievement. TP53 mutation was associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic abnormality has important impact on AML prognosis, not only the well-known NCCN risk stratification involved cytogenetic abnormity and molecule genes, but also other recent identified prognostic genes [25][26][27]. Therefore, we then detected the gene mutations in our patients and found 49 mutated genes which were classified as first-, second-, and third-class mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Genetic abnormality has important impact on AML prognosis, not only the well-known NCCN risk stratification involved cytogenetic abnormity and molecule genes, but also other recent identified prognostic genes [25][26][27]. Therefore, we then detected the gene mutations in our patients and found 49 mutated genes which were classified as first-, second-, and third-class mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…After excluding duplicated records, we screened the results based on title and abstract and selected 179 studies for further full-text evaluation. Finally, 32 studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] were included in our meta-analysis. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of study selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%