<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Mutations of the tumor protein p53 (TP53) gene were considered to be associated with an unfavorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This meta-analysis aimed to systematically elucidate the prognostic value of TP53 mutation in adult patients with AML. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A comprehensive literature search was conducted for eligible studies published before August 2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for prognostic parameters. Subgroup analyses based on intensive treatment were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-two studies with 7,062 patients were included. As compared to wild-type carriers, AML patients with TP53 mutations had significantly shorter OS (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 2.16–2.67, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 46.6%). Similar results were found in DFS (HR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.88–4.38), EFS (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.97–3.31), and RFS (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.79–3.22). Mutant TP53 predicted inferior OS (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 2.41–3.18) in the intensively treated AML subgroup, compared with the non-intensively treated group (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.58–2.26). Among intensively-treated AML patients, the age of 65 did not affect the prognostic value of TP53 mutations. Besides, TP53 mutation was also strongly associated with an elevated risk of adverse cytogenetics, which conferred a dismal OS in AML patients (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.74–2.37). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> TP53 mutation exhibits a promising potential for discriminating AML patients with a worse prognosis, thus being capable of serving as a novel tool for prognostication and therapeutic decision-making in the management of AML.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.