2019
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2019.2911946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Selective Projection with Low-Rank Embedding and Dual Laplacian Regularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of using all of the similarities in D S and T S , we extract the local neighbor information of drugs and targets. As to different drugs, the local neighbor similarity matrix can be obtained from D S by where 𝒩 ( d j ) denoted the neighbors of drug d j .In a similar way, the local neighbor similarity matrix can be obtained from T S by where 𝒩 ( t j ) denoted the neighbors of target t j .Since the iterations between drugs and targets are complex, different to previous graph regularized methods that only use the first-order connections to reflect the local pairwise proximity between vertices in a graph [ 45 – 48 ], we use the second-order connection to constrain that similar drugs should be connected with similar targets. Therefore, we have the following similarity affinity matrices calculating form: where and represent the i th and j th column of original , respectively, and and represent the i th and j th column of original , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of using all of the similarities in D S and T S , we extract the local neighbor information of drugs and targets. As to different drugs, the local neighbor similarity matrix can be obtained from D S by where 𝒩 ( d j ) denoted the neighbors of drug d j .In a similar way, the local neighbor similarity matrix can be obtained from T S by where 𝒩 ( t j ) denoted the neighbors of target t j .Since the iterations between drugs and targets are complex, different to previous graph regularized methods that only use the first-order connections to reflect the local pairwise proximity between vertices in a graph [ 45 – 48 ], we use the second-order connection to constrain that similar drugs should be connected with similar targets. Therefore, we have the following similarity affinity matrices calculating form: where and represent the i th and j th column of original , respectively, and and represent the i th and j th column of original , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N ðt j Þ denoted the neighbors of target t j .Since the iterations between drugs and targets are complex, different to previous graph regularized methods that only use the firstorder connections to reflect the local pairwise proximity between vertices in a graph [45][46][47][48], we use the secondorder connection to constrain that similar drugs should be connected with similar targets. Therefore, we have the following similarity affinity matrices calculating form:…”
Section: Problem Formulation Of Dti Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the neighborhood-based methods tend to be sensitive to noise and data corruption. Various methods are designed to capture the underlying manifold structures of the data [30][31][32][33][34]. To construct a noise-resistant graph, the representation-based graph construction approach adopts the linear regression to generate a set of the edges and compute the corresponding weights.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three metrics are calculated in target local region, supposing that the target size is a × b and d is set to 20 as the neighborhood width. Furthermore, the probability of detection (P d ) and false alarm rate (F a ) are also very important indicators for wholly evaluating the detection performance, which are defined as F a = number of false detections number of images (29) In experiments, we deem that the detection of small target is correct under this case where there are pixels within a 5 × 5 window centering on the ground truth. A good detector owns high P d under low F a .…”
Section: Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%