Feature mismatch effects in auditory negative

Leboe, Jason P.; Mondor, Todd A.; Leboe, Launa C.

doi:10.3758/bf03193353

Cited by 18 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, NP has also been observed with auditory stimuli (Leboe, Mondor & Leboe, 2006;Mayr & Buchner, 2007), with tactile stimuli (Frings, Bader, & Spence, 2008), and even with odors (Olsson, 1999). In addition, NP has been observed in cross-modal tasks (so far, only audition combined with vision; Buchner, Zabal, & Mayr, 2003) and even more intriguing -in the study of Buchner et al (2003) -the size of the NP effect did not depend on the modality.…”

Section: Np In Different Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 91%

The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Negative Priming (NP) is an influential paradigm in cognitive psychology that was originally developed to measure attentional selection. Yet, up to the mid-1990s, a large number of experimental reports questioned whether the NP effect is based on attentional inhibition and/or episodic retrieval processes. In this review, we summarize findings since the mid1990s and discuss new and old theoretical approaches to Negative Priming. We conclude that more than one process contributes to NP and that future research should analyze the conditions under which a particular process contributes to NP. Moreover, we argue that the paradigm -although it does not measure a single cognitive process alone -is still a useful tool for understanding selection in cognition. In fact, it might be a virtue of the paradigm that several cognitive processes work here together as selection in nonexperimental contexts is surely a multidimensional process. From this perspective, research on NP is relevant for all research fields analyzing selection. We therefore close our review by discussing the implications of the new evidence on NP for theories of selective attention.

show abstract

Section: Np In Different Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 91%

The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Importantly, though, identitybased NP has also been demonstrated in the auditory modality (e.g., Leboe, Mondor, & Leboe, 2006;Mayr & Buchner, 2007), in touch (Frings, Amendt, & Spence, 2011;Frings, Bader, & Spence, 2008), and even in olfaction (Olsson, 1999). Furthermore, Buchner, Zabal, and Mayr (2003) induced crossmodal identity-based NP using both auditory and visual stimuli.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial negative priming: In touch, it’s all about location

Wesslein

Spence

Mast

et al. 2015

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial negative priming (SNP) refers to the finding that responses to stimuli that are presented from previously ignored locations are slowed relative to responses to stimuli presented from previously unstimulated locations. To date, this effect has been demonstrated in vision, audition, and touch. Importantly, however, the cognitive processes involved differ between vision and audition. Although SNP is attributable to feature mismatch in the auditory modality, it is primarily caused by response inhibition in vision. To date, the locus of SNP in touch has not been established, though recently it has been shown that tactile SNP is not modulated by feature mismatch. Here, we demonstrate that in touch, as compared to vision and audition, SNP is more sensitive to the location features-and not solely to the response and stimulus features. Thus, in stark contrast to identity-based negative priming, in which responses to previously ignored stimuli (based on the stimulus identity) can be explained by the same mechanisms in all three sensory modalities, SNP would appear to be caused by different processes in each sensory modality, thus suggesting that the processing of the spatial properties of distractors is modality-specific.

show abstract

Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action

Zmigrod

Spapé

Hommel

2008

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding how the human brain integrates features of perceived events calls for the examination of binding processes within and across diVerent modalities and domains. Recent studies of feature-repetition eVects have demonstrated interactions between shape, color, and location in the visual modality and between pitch, loudness, and location in the auditory modality: repeating one feature is beneWcial if other features are also repeated, but detrimental if not. These partial-repetition costs suggest that cooccurring features are spontaneously bound into temporary event Wles. Here, we investigated whether these observations can be extended to features from diVerent sensory modalities, combining visual and auditory features in Experiment 1 and auditory and tactile features in Experiment 2. The same types of interactions, as for unimodal feature combinations, were obtained including interactions between stimulus and response features. However, the size of the interactions varied with the particular combination of features, suggesting that the salience of features and the temporal overlap between feature-code activations plays a mediating role.

show abstract

Feature mismatch effects in auditory negative

Cited by 18 publications

References 47 publications

The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention

The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention

Spatial negative priming: In touch, it’s all about location

Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About