2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ay25227a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature extraction for identification of drug body packing based on nonnegative matrix factorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36 The accumulating contribution rate for PCA was up to 95%. NMF 32 is a top-down generative algorithm that optimizes its internal representation to minimize the reconstruction error between the input and the reconstructed output. In addition, its weighted least-squares problem resolution can prevent the occurrence of negative factors and avoid contradicting the physical reality, which is important because the negative factors for the actual problems cannot be explained.…”
Section: Sers Spectrometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 The accumulating contribution rate for PCA was up to 95%. NMF 32 is a top-down generative algorithm that optimizes its internal representation to minimize the reconstruction error between the input and the reconstructed output. In addition, its weighted least-squares problem resolution can prevent the occurrence of negative factors and avoid contradicting the physical reality, which is important because the negative factors for the actual problems cannot be explained.…”
Section: Sers Spectrometry Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Finite difference (FD), 27 multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) 28 and standard normal variate variance (SNV) transformation 29 were then adopted to decrease the noise. Principal components analysis (PCA) 30,31 and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) 32 were used to extract the main information and reduce the dimension of the spectral data. Various data were then used to develop the classication models by SVM and RF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the K-nearest neighbor algorithm has been widely used in the eld of bioinformatics. [15][16][17][18] However, when using the K-nearest neighbor algorithm for predicting the various properties of protein, two problems must be taken into account, namely the choice of the parameter K and feature subset because they have important impacts on the performance of the model. Therefore, the parameter K and feature subset must be optimized to obtain the model with the best performance.…”
Section: Coupling Of Genetic Algorithm and K-nearest Neighbor Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various techniques, such as the uorescence of dual-emission quantum dot hybrids, 1 fast neutron scattering, 2 CT, 3 terahertz imaging 4 and homogeneous phase protein-based assays, 5 energy dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDXRD) for detection within complex backgrounds has been proved to be a promising method due to its non-destructiveness, high selectivity and high efficiency. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] This technology is based on measurement of the energy-dispersive low-angle scattering of photons from a polychromatic incident beam. For EDXRD testing, the EDXRD spectrum is a diffraction prole from the scattering media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a method of feature extraction, principal component analysis (PCA) has been used in the analysis of EDXRD spectra. 6,9,[15][16][17][18][19] According to the mathematical principle of PCA, it is an optimal linear dimensional reduction technique in the mean-square sense and seeks projection directions with maximal variances. PCA searches for directions efficient for representation, but fails to make use of class information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%