2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature extraction and severity assessment of partial discharge under protrusion defect based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Support vector machine (SVM), decision trees (DT), BP neural network (BPNN), LeNet5, AlexNet, VGG16, and LCNN models were used for GIS PD pattern recognition. The recognition results are given in Table 1 (with reference to [49], the maximum value, root mean square deviation, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and the peak-to-peak value were selected as feature parameters [49]). As can be seen in Table 1, the overall recognition rate of the LCNN reached 98.13% of 640 testing sets while the rates of SVM, BPNN, DT, LeNet5, AlexNet, and VGG16 were, respectively, 93.76%, 83.78%, 93.44%, 75.04%, 90.63%, and 86.41%.…”
Section: Accuracy Analysis Of Pattern Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector machine (SVM), decision trees (DT), BP neural network (BPNN), LeNet5, AlexNet, VGG16, and LCNN models were used for GIS PD pattern recognition. The recognition results are given in Table 1 (with reference to [49], the maximum value, root mean square deviation, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and the peak-to-peak value were selected as feature parameters [49]). As can be seen in Table 1, the overall recognition rate of the LCNN reached 98.13% of 640 testing sets while the rates of SVM, BPNN, DT, LeNet5, AlexNet, and VGG16 were, respectively, 93.76%, 83.78%, 93.44%, 75.04%, 90.63%, and 86.41%.…”
Section: Accuracy Analysis Of Pattern Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], the rapid-charging-station model has been formulated based on queuing theory. 4-The fourth method is based on traffic studies and origin-destination (OD) concepts [18][19][20]. In addition, a comprehensive review and comparison of load-modeling techniques is available in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method extracts the signal with high efficiency, but when extracting the communication transmission signal, the accurate signal feature function cannot be obtained, the characteristics of the transmission signal extracted from the electronic communication network are too abstract, and the signal extraction precision is low. Zeng, F. et al [3] introduced a feature extraction method based on multi-dimensional signal feature fusion for transmission signals in electronic communication networks. The method extracts single multidimensional signal features in the time domain, frequency domain, and high-order spectral domain from the radio frequency signal of the communication target; fuses the extracted features; and then uses the support vector machine to classify the signal features to realize the transmission in electronic communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%