2010
DOI: 10.1167/6.6.827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature congestion: A measure of visual clutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
179
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saliency, as a composite measure of low-level visual information, is positively correlated with the presence of objects (Elazary & Itti, 2008), and found to guide attention in tasks where targets are underspecified (e.g., memorization, Underwood & Foulsham, 2006), and also utilized during situated language production (Gleitman et al, 2007). In our view, the most appropriate way to define visual saliency is in terms of visual clutter, calculated by integrating low-level visual information, e.g., color, with edge information (Rosenholtz, Mansfield, & Jin, 2005). The inclusion of edges sets apart clutter from standard visual saliency (Itti & Koch, 2000), which is based solely on low-level features, without taking object-based visual information such as edges into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Saliency, as a composite measure of low-level visual information, is positively correlated with the presence of objects (Elazary & Itti, 2008), and found to guide attention in tasks where targets are underspecified (e.g., memorization, Underwood & Foulsham, 2006), and also utilized during situated language production (Gleitman et al, 2007). In our view, the most appropriate way to define visual saliency is in terms of visual clutter, calculated by integrating low-level visual information, e.g., color, with edge information (Rosenholtz, Mansfield, & Jin, 2005). The inclusion of edges sets apart clutter from standard visual saliency (Itti & Koch, 2000), which is based solely on low-level features, without taking object-based visual information such as edges into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We used Photoshop to paste the target objects (e.g., MAN and CLIPBOARD) into the scene and added distractors to obtain the cluttered version of the same scene. A paired-samples t-test was conducted to test that the visual clutter (measured as Feature Congestion, Rosenholtz et al, 2005) in Minimal scenes (mean = 2.78, SD = 1.12) was significantly smaller than in their Cluttered version (mean = 3.52, SD = 0.33; t(46) = 3.71, p = 0.0005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Wood [36], people perceive a higher complexity with denser and more dissimilar information presentation. With a similar definition in mind, Rosenholtz et al [29] predicted whether maps are perceived as cluttered based on a calculation of several features: colors and luminance, different sizes, shapes, and motions. Clutter, in her definition, increases in tandem to the number of unusual objects human attention is drawn to-a concept that is partially related to visual complexity [30].…”
Section: Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other differences in human vision which may be worth modeling, e.g. light receptor density and distribution, perception of motion, optical flow, visual crowding [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%