2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12559-014-9254-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Component-Based Extreme Learning Machines for Finger Vein Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional finger vein approaches employ distance-based methods during the matching stage. Accuracy rate of almost all the proposed machine learning finger vein algorithms is close to 100% [61,85,86,105,115]. Table 6 lists the existing literature on traditional machine learning techniques-related finger vein recognition.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learning Finger Vein Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, conventional finger vein approaches employ distance-based methods during the matching stage. Accuracy rate of almost all the proposed machine learning finger vein algorithms is close to 100% [61,85,86,105,115]. Table 6 lists the existing literature on traditional machine learning techniques-related finger vein recognition.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learning Finger Vein Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Note that N is different for datasets, e.g., according to Moreover, all parameters were optimized based on a validation set of [33][34][35][36][37] cases which were selected in the respective test period (illustrated in Table 2). In the test period, one case was selected in every 10 days to construct the validation dataset and the remaining cases were employed as the test data.…”
Section: Setup Of Re-elm Os-elm and Mcos-elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes finger vein media resistant to theft and forgery. In practice, however, FVRSs suffer from external factors such as imaging models [ 10 ] and uneven illumination [ 11 , 12 ], and internal factors including scattering [ 13 ] and finger tissue [ 14 ]. These factors cause the finger vein images to become unstable and have low contrast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%