2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cagd.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature-based 3D morphing based on geometrically constrained spherical parameterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the 3D convex hull, the disturbance regions (DRs) of the face are identified as those exhibiting strong concavity intensities, as depicted as brighter areas in the concavity intensity map, and they are removed prior to the subsequent phase (i.e., see the bottom-right box), which also include the fusion of both modalities [12,13]. To ensure that the DRs are homogeneous and are strongly connected closures [7,10], a second stage of SymRG is also implemented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the 3D convex hull, the disturbance regions (DRs) of the face are identified as those exhibiting strong concavity intensities, as depicted as brighter areas in the concavity intensity map, and they are removed prior to the subsequent phase (i.e., see the bottom-right box), which also include the fusion of both modalities [12,13]. To ensure that the DRs are homogeneous and are strongly connected closures [7,10], a second stage of SymRG is also implemented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lui et al [16,25] developed a method for landmark-constrained spherical parameterizations. In [26], Athanasiadis et al proposed a feature-preserving spherical parameterization method based on geometrically constrained optimization. In [27], Wang et al developed an as-rigid-as-possible method for spherical parameterization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friedel et al [17] employed an energy minimization to generate spherical representations and achieved about 14K triangles/minute. Athanasiadis et al [32] presented a feature-based parameterization method and achieved about 1.1K triangles/minute. Aigerman [8] presented a parameterization method for surface property mapping and achieved about 3.5K triangles/minute.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%