2013
DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e3283616512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of using event-related potentials as a sideline measure of neurocognitive dysfunction during sporting events

Abstract: This study recorded brain event-related potentials (ERPs) during an attention task under two conditions: (a) immediately after strenuous exercise and (b) immediately after an extended rest period. The goal was to examine the effect of different physiological states on the electrophysiological data. As expected, a larger P3b ERP component was observed in response to attended infrequent events. Strenuous exercise did not differentially alter the amplitude or latency of the brain response during an attention task… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Concussion History group did have fewer correct Match trials relative to the Control group (see Table I), which we acknowledge as a limitation. However, both groups contributed a minimum number of trials for behavioral and ERP analysis consistent with other work (e.g., > 30 trials for each condition per individual; Duncan, Kosmidis, & Mirsky, 2003; Ledwidge & Molfese, 2016), even within a single participant (Kota, Kelsey, Rigoni, & Molfese, 2013). Average reaction time (RT; from stimulus onset) and accuracy (percentage of correct trials) were computed for each participant for both the Match and Non-match conditions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Concussion History group did have fewer correct Match trials relative to the Control group (see Table I), which we acknowledge as a limitation. However, both groups contributed a minimum number of trials for behavioral and ERP analysis consistent with other work (e.g., > 30 trials for each condition per individual; Duncan, Kosmidis, & Mirsky, 2003; Ledwidge & Molfese, 2016), even within a single participant (Kota, Kelsey, Rigoni, & Molfese, 2013). Average reaction time (RT; from stimulus onset) and accuracy (percentage of correct trials) were computed for each participant for both the Match and Non-match conditions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These strategies are highly specific and provide ongoing information about neurocognitive mechanisms and efficiency. Recent work by Kota and colleagues (2013) demonstrated the consistency between ERPs following periods of physical activity and rest, highlighting possible use of ERPs as an immediate sideline measure. In addition to identifying aberrant function, ERPs can indicate multimodal impairments that persist beyond neurocognitive processing (Folmer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To increase statistical power, 63 the averaged ERPs were clustered into nine bilateral scalp regions: inferior frontal, inferior occipital, inferior temporal, occipital, orbital, parietal, prefrontal, tempoparietal, and temporal. 64 Event-related potential brain source localization. Using all 256 electrode placements, we determined sources of brain localization that employed the sLORETA constraint 45 within the GeoSource software package (version 2.0; EGI).…”
Section: Event-related Potential Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, regional averaging controls for the inflated degrees of freedom inherent in recordings from multiple single electrodes. 70 We recommend that future researchers consider using this regional averaging approach based on scalp topography 64 in order to reduce electrode recording errors and type 1 error inflation rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%