2009
DOI: 10.26719/2009.15.2.362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of quality of life assessment in routine clinical oncology practice: a Tunisian study

Abstract: Faisabilité d'une évaluation de la qualité de vie dans la pratique clinique de routine en oncologie : une étude tunisienne RÉSUMÉ La recherche consacrée à la qualité de vie des patients cancéreux dans les pays en développement est limitée. Afin d'estimer la faisabilité d'une évaluation de la qualité de vie dans une cohorte de patients cancéreux tunisiens, nous avons présenté le questionnaire QLQ-C30 de l'EORTC à 23 femmes traitées par chimiothérapie adjuvante en ambulatoire pour un cancer du sein à un stade pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean score of GHS-QOL in our study (Mean 53.4; SD 17.7) is close to those reported by studies conducted in Lebanon (Mean 59.6, SD 29.1) [23] and Nepal (Mean52.8, SD 24.6) [24]. Whereas it is lower than those recorded in other Arab countries such as United Arab Emirates (Mean 74.6) [25], Tunisia (Mean 68.5) [26], Bahrain (Mean 63.9) [27] and Jordan (Mean63.7) [28]. Although, our score is higher than that reported in Kuwait (mean=45.3) [29] and Pakistan (Mean48.3) [30].…”
Section: Quality Of Life Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The mean score of GHS-QOL in our study (Mean 53.4; SD 17.7) is close to those reported by studies conducted in Lebanon (Mean 59.6, SD 29.1) [23] and Nepal (Mean52.8, SD 24.6) [24]. Whereas it is lower than those recorded in other Arab countries such as United Arab Emirates (Mean 74.6) [25], Tunisia (Mean 68.5) [26], Bahrain (Mean 63.9) [27] and Jordan (Mean63.7) [28]. Although, our score is higher than that reported in Kuwait (mean=45.3) [29] and Pakistan (Mean48.3) [30].…”
Section: Quality Of Life Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“… Accepted as Type IV evidence? El Sharkawi et al [ 17 ] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Awad et al [ 18 ] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (just for breast cancer patients) Yes Alawadi and Ohaeri [ 19 ] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Masmoudi et al [ 20 ] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Mostafa et al [ 21 ] Yes Yes Yes No ND Yes Yes Yes Yes No (type II) Al-Naggar et al [ 22 ] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Huijer and Abboud [ 23 ] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Denewer et al [ 24 ] Yes Yes Yes No ND …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… - The biological and treatment side effect factors seemed to be more important than family and institutional supports A longitudinal study is needed to confirm this trend. Masmoudi et al [ 20 ] Tunisia Department of Medical Oncology in Sfax University Hospital Descriptive study 23 women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy Assess the feasibility of QOL assessment in a cohort of Tunisian cancer patients The Arabic version of EORTC QLQ-C30 Participants had a mean score for global QOL of 72.5 pre chemo And 68.5 during chemo. A significant deterioration in physical, cognitive, and social functioning, between the pre-treatment and on-treatment assessments Group I:pre-treatment Group II:on-treatment improvement of cancer care infrastructure and public education is still needed before reliable QOL studies can be performed Mostafa et al [ 21 ] Egypt El- Minia oncology center Interventional hospital based study, 180 female breast cancer patients recei-ving treatment Assess QOL, its relation to different variables related to cancer Trial to improve the QOL of patients and their families through communication, counseling, restorative (rehabilitative) therapy, social and medical support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations