2001
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.106.917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Probing Dark Energy with Strong Gravitational Lensing Systems: Fisher-Matrix Approach

Abstract: We assess the feasibility of probing dark energy with strong gravitational lensing systems. The capability of the method, which depends on the accuracy with which the lensing systems are modeled, is quantitatively investigated using the Fisher-matrix formalism. We show that this method might place useful constraints on the density parameter and the redshift evolution of the dark energy by combining it with a constraint from supernova measurements. For this purpose, the lens potential needs to be precisely reco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inversion of gravitational lensing systems is interesting in its own right, since it puts constraints on the spatial dark matter distribution of the lensing objects and thus helps constrain dark matter physics (Diemand, Moore & Stadel 2004; Navarro et al 2004), but it may also contribute to cosmology. Good reconstructions of lensing systems may help to constrain the density parameter and the redshift evolution of the dark energy (Yamamoto et al 2001; Soucail, Kneib & Golse 2004; Meneghetti et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inversion of gravitational lensing systems is interesting in its own right, since it puts constraints on the spatial dark matter distribution of the lensing objects and thus helps constrain dark matter physics (Diemand, Moore & Stadel 2004; Navarro et al 2004), but it may also contribute to cosmology. Good reconstructions of lensing systems may help to constrain the density parameter and the redshift evolution of the dark energy (Yamamoto et al 2001; Soucail, Kneib & Golse 2004; Meneghetti et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not discussed in this paper, a very interesting piece of work would be to investigate the potentiality of an accurate strong lensing analysis as a cosmological tool (e.g. Link & Pierce 1998; Yamamoto et al 2001; Golse, Kneib & Soucail 2002; Soucail, Kneib & Golse 2004). Previous works (Yamamoto et al 2001; Chiba & Takahashi 2002; Sereno 2002; Dalal, Holder & Hennawi 2004) suggest that the lensing observables are primarily dependent on the lens model, while the dependence in the cosmological parameters is minor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cluster lens systems are scarce, the impressive number of lensed images in each system means that they still contain a lot of information, particularly regarding cluster mass profiles. The information is harder to extract because of the relatively complicated gravitational potentials, but if this challenge can be overcome they could be highly useful probes, certainly of cluster physics and potentially also for cosmology (Yamamoto & Futamase 2001; Yamamoto et al 2001; Chiba & Takahashi 2002; Golse, Kneib & Soucail 2002; Sereno 2002; Meneghetti et al 2004). The intention of this paper is to improve the methods for extracting this information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For strong lensing time delay cosmography, the source should be a bright, time varying object such as an active galactic nucleus (AGN) and the lens is generally a foreground galaxy (as cluster lenses are harder to model). See [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] for further details on strong lensing time delays as a cosmological probe.…”
Section: Measuring Time Delay Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%