2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of employing a smartphone as the payload in a photogrammetric UAV system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of vehicle for positioning sensors directly impacts the scale of research that can be conducted as well as the achievable sensor resolution and associated costs (for review of vehicles, considerations, and limitations, see White et al, 2012;Sankaran et al, 2015). For phenotyping large ecological systems, satellites and manned aircraft remain the only practical option (Kerr and Ostrovsky, 2003;Asner et al, 2012), but small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) are now a viable alternative for smaller, geographically distinct areas (Kim et al, 2013). Finally, for small-scale experimental field studies, several vehicle options include high-clearance tractors, cable gantries, cranes, linear move irrigation systems, and small UASs in addition to stationary observation platforms (Haberland, 2010;Andrade-Sanchez et al, 2013;Busemeyer et al, 2013a;Chapman et al, 2014;Liebisch et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of vehicle for positioning sensors directly impacts the scale of research that can be conducted as well as the achievable sensor resolution and associated costs (for review of vehicles, considerations, and limitations, see White et al, 2012;Sankaran et al, 2015). For phenotyping large ecological systems, satellites and manned aircraft remain the only practical option (Kerr and Ostrovsky, 2003;Asner et al, 2012), but small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) are now a viable alternative for smaller, geographically distinct areas (Kim et al, 2013). Finally, for small-scale experimental field studies, several vehicle options include high-clearance tractors, cable gantries, cranes, linear move irrigation systems, and small UASs in addition to stationary observation platforms (Haberland, 2010;Andrade-Sanchez et al, 2013;Busemeyer et al, 2013a;Chapman et al, 2014;Liebisch et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCP and CP residuals were compared between PhotoScan and DBAT in Experiment 1 and PhotoScan and Apero in Experiment 2. This method of bundle adjustment assessment is often used in the literature [52][53][54]. After the comparisons were performed and the results validated, metrics from the open source algorithms were then used to perform a quality assessment of the project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, the UAV communities have made significant progresses in light-weighted sensor and UAV system developments [21,22], improving data preprocessing [23], registration [24][25][26][27], and image matching [28][29][30]. As a result, the low-cost system and automated mapping software have allowed users to conveniently apply UAV to various applications including change detection [31], leaf area index (LAI) mapping [32], vegetation cover estimation [33], vegetation species mapping [34], water stress mapping [35], power line surveys [36], building detection and damage assessment [37,38], and comparison with terrestrial LiDAR surveys [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%