2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of amlodipine besylate, chloroquine phosphate, dapsone, phenytoin, pyridoxine hydrochloride, sulfadiazine, sulfasalazine, tetracycline hydrochloride, trimethoprim and zonisamide in SyrSpend ® SF PH4 oral suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No detectable change was observed in the prepared suspensions. The suspension showed more stability at 4°C than 25°C (91 days and 56 days respectively) [14].…”
Section: Amlodipine Besylate Suspensionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No detectable change was observed in the prepared suspensions. The suspension showed more stability at 4°C than 25°C (91 days and 56 days respectively) [14].…”
Section: Amlodipine Besylate Suspensionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In ambered plastic bottles the suspension was placed in room temperature for 90 days. The sample was analyzed using HPLC at different time interval (14,28,56, and 90 days). Results revealed that the drug showed up to 90% stability at 90 th day in both the preparations and there were significant physical or chemical changes were observed neither any microbial growth was detected [8].…”
Section: Rufinamide Oral Suspensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity, precision, accuracy, linearity and limits of detection and quantification were determined following a protocol described in a previous study 36. In this protocol, during specificity determination a stressing test was also conducted (acid, alkaline, ultraviolet light, heat and oxidising stresses).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence of physical phenomena (precipitation, turbidity, macroscopically visible crystal growth, odour generation, phase separation, flocculation or caking) was checked. A detailed protocol is described by Ferreira et al 36 Samples were withdrawn at 0 (baseline), 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days (T=0, 7, 14, 30, 60 or 90) and assayed six times at each time point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compatibility results with SyrSpend SF have been published for more than 70 different APIs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In all of these studies, the compatibility was assessed by measuring the percentage recovery at varying time points throughout a 90-day period at controlled room and/or at controlled refrigerated temperature. The majority of the compatibility studies have been performed with raw pharmaceutical APIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%