2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.085442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe/CoO(001) and Fe/CoO(111) bilayers: Effect of crystal orientation on the exchange bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering T EB < T N , the temperature dependence of the H E is given byHE(1TTEB)from the RFM model . The best fit (using T EB = 150 K), as reported in the inset of Figure , gives clearly a linear relationship between H E and (1TTEB) in agreement with the linear propensity of FeNi‐CoO reported by Carey and Berkowitz and that of Fe–CoO by Mlynczak et al The present studies thus open the scope for further investigation on ferromagnetic FeCo with various shells and the influence of various physical parameters on the EB characteristics, for the particles synthesized using the chemical reduction process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering T EB < T N , the temperature dependence of the H E is given byHE(1TTEB)from the RFM model . The best fit (using T EB = 150 K), as reported in the inset of Figure , gives clearly a linear relationship between H E and (1TTEB) in agreement with the linear propensity of FeNi‐CoO reported by Carey and Berkowitz and that of Fe–CoO by Mlynczak et al The present studies thus open the scope for further investigation on ferromagnetic FeCo with various shells and the influence of various physical parameters on the EB characteristics, for the particles synthesized using the chemical reduction process.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The T EB is usually either less than or nearly equal to the Néel temperature ( T N ) according to the magnetic anisotropy and thickness of the AFM phase. Thus, T EB of FM‐CoO alloy is close to T N of 290 K whereas that of FM‐Fe‐oxide is below 50 K . Assuming the presence of γ‐Fe 2 O 3 with average thickness close to 2.2 and 2.7 nm in the as‐prepared and size‐reduced FeCo, respectively, the T EB is not expected to differ by 100 K between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…CoO was considered as a model system to study the exchange coupling effect in FM/AFM systems, because of its easily accessible Néel temperature (T N ~ 290 K), which is close to room temperature (RT) [17,18], and the high-quality epitaxial growth of CoO films [19,20]. Moreover, the AFM properties of CoO films can be measured directly by the X-ray magnetic linear dichroism (XMLD) effect [11,13,19,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, when the antiferromagnetic layers with different crystal orientations are selected, the magnetic properties of the heterostructures are completely different as there may exist compensated and uncompensated magnetic planes. 12 Furthermore, in the ferromagnetic/multiferroic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 4 systems, the interfacial construction could be modulated by an extra freedom of ferroelectric order, providing an effective way in mediating the magnetotransport properties by electric fields 13, 14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%