2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.895243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDI, Regulations and Growth

Abstract: The paper explores the linkage between income growth rates and foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows. So far the evidence is rather mixed, as no robust relationship between FDI and income growth has been established. We argue that countries need a sound business environment in the form of good government regulations to be able to benefit from FDI. Using a comprehensive data set for regulations, we test this hypothesis and find evidence that excessive regulations restrict growth through FDI only in the most r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors Busse and Groizard (2006) express the opinion that the countries which economies are heavily regulated by the state, do not suffer, or suffer just a few Foreign Direct Investment benefits for the country. The authors mention that the host state enterprises become more competitive when they accept a foreign competitor and try to maintain a leading position.…”
Section: The Importance Of Foreign Direct Investment Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors Busse and Groizard (2006) express the opinion that the countries which economies are heavily regulated by the state, do not suffer, or suffer just a few Foreign Direct Investment benefits for the country. The authors mention that the host state enterprises become more competitive when they accept a foreign competitor and try to maintain a leading position.…”
Section: The Importance Of Foreign Direct Investment Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category finds a positive unconditional effect of FDI on growth - Blomstrom et al (1996); Gao (2001) and Lensink and Morrissey (2006). The second finds an ambiguous role for FDI alone on economic growth and find an important role for various conditioning factors that promote the beneficial effects of FDI -Borensztein et al (1998), Campos and Kinoshita (2002), OECD (2002), Alfaro et al (2004), Busse andGroizard (2008), Agrawal (2000). The problem with this class of studies is that they do not reach any consensus as to the most important conditioning, or facilitating, factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the regional level, FDI inflows help deepen group commitment toward established directives in a partnership, as investors are likely to allow their resources in a more united and stable economies than in a single economy (te Velde and Bezemer, 2006). Busse and Groizard (2006) outlined some pre-requisites of an effective FDI in an economy. The foremost was infrastructure and institutional quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Gregorio and Guidotti (1995) in a country-based study highlighted the issue of human capital development. Similarly, Kamara (2013) emphasized human capital development and institutional quality as mentioned by Busse and Groizard (2006). Effective human capital optimizes output performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%