Africa-China investment and growth link

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate China–Africa Investment link, using over two decades of FDI’s data. During the specified periods, African economic growth path has been predominantly upward trending, despite multiple external threats. This impressive growth was partly because of the growth of FDI stock across the region. This study explores the various sources of FDI to Africa, mainly China’s FDI’s and how they influence African macroeconomic indicators, i.e. unemployment, export and import activities. Design/methodology/approach Pesaran autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) is used as a framework to test the short-run and long-run relationship of indicators. Granger causality test checked the causality between growth and macroeconomic indicators. Findings The link between China’s FDI and African economic growth reported a negative/declining effect in both short and long run. In the long run, the effect of world FDI on growth was significant but not the in the short run. However, US FDI to Africa, China Export and Import from Africa reported an insignificant effect on growth. There was no evidence of Okun’s law, as a decrease in Africa unemployment does not increase growth. Overall, China’s FDI’s inflows to Africa are allocated to capital-intensive activities which has less labor employability. The Granger causality test reported a uni-directional link between growth and all series, except for human capital which experienced no link at all in all directions. Despite the issue of socio-infrastructure militating against growth in the region, African economy is likely to perform better, if more FDI’s are channeled into labor-intensive activities, because it has a reductive effect on unemployment. Research limitations/implications The research considered point annual FDI data but not accumulated stock and is a macro-based study, i.e. regional economy. Practical implications This paper bridged the literature gap in African investment performance by providing an empirical justification in understanding the inflow of FDI, especially China. This is a useful guard in policy design and implementations in the attraction of the right type of investment, so as to reduce unemployment and promote growth. Originality/value The authors confirm that this study has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration in whole or in part by another journal.

A Panel Data Analysis of Economic Growth Determinants in 34 African Countries

“…In essence, the relationship between FDI and economic growth is rather complex and has been tackled by numerous studies in the literature (Balcilar et al 2018;de Mello 2007;Gui-Diby 2014;Hansen and Rand 2006;Jenkins and Edwards 2006;Kukeli 2007;Koomsonet-Abekah and Nwaba 2018;Ndambiri et al 2012;Olofin et al 2019). For instance, by using data from 28 African countries for the period 2004-2014, Munemo (2018 showed that FDI had a positive impact on entrepreneurship and the development of national markets.…”

The geostrategy of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AFCFTA) and third parties: a focus on China

“…The main issue with Chinese investment in Africa is the debt crisis in Africa. Nevertheless, Chinese investments in Africa are not unwarranted [102][103][104]. Prior to adding more debt to Africa's stockpile, there are many deficits in other areas that need to be addressed.…”

Evolution and influencing factors of the transnational investment network of China—Africa international cooperation parks

“…Using the SNA method, this study examined the structure and spatiotemporal evolution of the transnational investment network of CAICPs with a view to gleaning a better understanding the investment cooperation between China and Africa regarding industrial parks. Unlike previous analyses of geo-economic linkages based on a single investment, a single trade (Isaac and Eugene, 2018;Oqubay and Lin, 2019), or international relations (Ayodele and Sotola, 2014), the multi-subject and multi-period transnational investment linkages con-sidered in this study are more objective and comprehensive. The investment links between African countries, China, and third parties illustrate the characteristics of multi-participation in CAICPs.…”