2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG-avid presacral soft tissue mass in previously treated rectal cancer: Diagnostic outcome and additional value of MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, even PET/TC has some limitations in detecting small lesions and evaluating mucinous tumor recurrence because mucinous adenocarcinomas have poor FDG uptake. In addition, false positives may occur in areas of post-operative infectious or inflammatory scar tissue [28,29]. For these reasons, to date, only repeated imaging and CT-guided biopsy sampling can confirm the presence of growing mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, even PET/TC has some limitations in detecting small lesions and evaluating mucinous tumor recurrence because mucinous adenocarcinomas have poor FDG uptake. In addition, false positives may occur in areas of post-operative infectious or inflammatory scar tissue [28,29]. For these reasons, to date, only repeated imaging and CT-guided biopsy sampling can confirm the presence of growing mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, combining TACE with sorafenib could improve the survival rate of PLC patients. However, large-scale clinical studies are needed to confirm its efficacy [ 23 , 24 ]. In this work, patients with PLC who missed the opportunity for surgery were selected as the research objects, and the patients were randomly rolled into an experimental group and a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET/CT was shown to facilitate the differentiation between benign and malignant presacral lesions (sensitivity 100%, specificity 96%) [8]. However, a recent study described a PPV of only 58% for FDG-avid presacral lesions on PET/ CT, but improved diagnostic performance after the addition of MRI sequences [22]. PET has also been shown to be reliable in the detection of metastases, as well as having significant impact on further management [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%