2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.119134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FCHSD2 cooperates with CDC42 and N-WASP to regulate cell protrusion formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The localization of FCHSD2 in mammalian cells has been studied primarily using exogenous protein, with reports indicating subcellular localization underneath the plasma membrane (Almeida-Souza et al ., 2018) and at actin protrusions (Zhai et al , 2022b). Given the role of MICAL-L1 in scaffolding endosome fission machinery, we hypothesized that some FCHSD2 might be transiently localized to endosomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The localization of FCHSD2 in mammalian cells has been studied primarily using exogenous protein, with reports indicating subcellular localization underneath the plasma membrane (Almeida-Souza et al ., 2018) and at actin protrusions (Zhai et al , 2022b). Given the role of MICAL-L1 in scaffolding endosome fission machinery, we hypothesized that some FCHSD2 might be transiently localized to endosomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next addressed the potential mechanism by which FCHSD2 regulates endosome fission. Given the role of FCHSD2 in actin regulation and control of WASP (Almeida-Souza et al ., 2018; Becalska et al ., 2013; Rodal et al ., 2008; Stanishneva-Konovalova et al ., 2016; Zhai et al ., 2022b), we hypothesized that FCHSD2 may regulate fission by activation of ARP2/3 leading to actin polymerization and branching at the endosomal membrane, thus facilitating membrane budding. Indeed, treatment of cells with the ARP2/3 inhibitor, CK-666 (Nolen et al , 2009), led to impaired actin filament generation at RAB5 Q79L enlarged endosomes, whereas the CK-689 control had no effect on endosomal actin (EV4), highlighting the role of ARP2/3 in generating branched actin at endosomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TOCA-1 and other F-BAR domain proteins have well-described roles in endocytosis and promotion of positively curved membrane structures such as cytoplasmic tubular networks ( Frost et al, 2008 ; Taylor et al, 2019 ; Ledoux et al, 2023 ), but there are precedents for these and related BAR domain proteins acting in negatively curved membrane structures ( Qualmann and Kelly, 2000 ; She et al, 2002 ; Chitu et al, 2005 ; Guerrier et al, 2009 ; Shimada et al, 2010 ; Becalska et al, 2013 ; Zhai et al, 2022 ). This suggests that any membrane curvature preference of F-BAR domain proteins does not limit them to certain cellular functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOCA-1 and other membrane adaptors in filopodia formation TOCA-1 and other F-BAR proteins have well-described roles in endocytosis and promotion of positively curved membrane structures such as cytoplasmic tubular networks (Frost et al, 2008;Taylor et al, 2019). While the inverse F-BAR proteins SRGAP1-3 bind to negatively curved membrane like I-BAR proteins (Guerrier et al, 2009), positively curved F-BAR proteins have also been shown to induce, or localise to, membrane structures with mostly negative curvature such as filopodia (including Gas7 (She et al, 2002), PACSIN-1/-2 (Qualmann and Kelly, 2000;Shimada et al, 2010), Nwk (Becalska et al, 2013;Zhai et al, 2022)), suggesting that any membrane curvature preference of F-BAR proteins does not limit them to certain cellular functions. This could be possible because of alternative binding modes that target flat membrane (Frost et al, 2008;McDonald et al, 2015), or the presence of complex membrane curvatures for example those observed by EM in dendritic filopodial precursors (Galic et al, 2014) and described theoretically (Mancinelli et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%