2010
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2009.0279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Favorable Operating Conditions for Obtaining High-Value Struvite Product from Sludge Dewatering Filtrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the reaction time can affect the properties of the precipitate. A shorter reaction time may be beneficial for purity; however, it may be adverse for the particle size . Based on the experiments on the laboratory scale, the reaction time for the mixed solution from the HTL byproducts of manure was reduced to 60 min and HTL byproducts of sewage sludge in the presence of CA increased to 600 min.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the reaction time can affect the properties of the precipitate. A shorter reaction time may be beneficial for purity; however, it may be adverse for the particle size . Based on the experiments on the laboratory scale, the reaction time for the mixed solution from the HTL byproducts of manure was reduced to 60 min and HTL byproducts of sewage sludge in the presence of CA increased to 600 min.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although pH 8.5 does not maximize P recovery as struvite, Hao et al [24] reported that struvite formation at pH~8.5 lessened the prospect of Ca and Mg co-precipitates. Lew et al [29] reported more Mg 2+ and PO 4 3− co-precipitates formed at higher pH (conditions that maximized struvite formation). Operating under conditions that promote mixed P precipitate formation may be allowable under some circumstances, but a business aimed at commercializing struvite fertilizer will likely desire a relatively pure product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…gap at the base of their shared wall (Figure ). Most struvite reactors are either plug-flow or CSTR with separate FBRs. ,, Thus, the combination of the CSTR and FBR into a single compact unit is a novel design . For CO 2 (g) purging, air flow is applied to the CSTR at 42 L air L –1 reactor volume h –1 to maximize CO 2 (g) stripping while minimizing NH 4 –N volatilization, and a vacuum tube removes foam formed by aeration.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural wastewater can be treated for nutrient recovery by an aerated fluidized bed reactor (aerated-FBR) method that precipitates PO 4 –P and NH 4 –N as struvite (MgNH 4 PO 4 ·6H 2 O), a viable slow release fertilizer. Struvite precipitation is predicted from its saturation index (SI), which is influenced by Mg 2+ , NH 4 –N, and PO 4 –P concentrations (eqs S1–S2), and is optimized at pH 9–10 (Figure S1). For aerated-FBR treatment, struvite precipitation can be induced by raising the wastewater pH from a typical value of pH 6–8 to pH 8–9 by carbon dioxide [CO 2 (g)] stripping with aeration and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) titration .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%