2010
DOI: 10.1029/2010tc002673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault zone structure from topography: Signatures of en echelon fault slip at Mustang Ridge on the San Andreas Fault, Monterey County, California

Abstract: We used high‐resolution topography to quantify the spatial distribution of scarps, linear valleys, topographic sinks, and oversteepened stream channels formed along an extensional step over on the San Andreas Fault (SAF) at Mustang Ridge, California. This location provides detail of both creeping fault landform development and complex fault zone kinematics. Here, the SAF creeps 10–14 mm/yr slower than at locations ∼20 km along the fault in either direction. This spatial change in creep rate is coincident with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although fault creep is found on numerous faults, especially on large-scale strike-slip faults [41], there is lack of detailed study about the R -factor on the Longmen Shan fault zone. In this calculation, the R value of 0.9 is adopted because of more difficulties of creep slip on thrust faults than on strike-slip and normal faults.…”
Section: Moment Accumulation Rate In the Seismogenic Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fault creep is found on numerous faults, especially on large-scale strike-slip faults [41], there is lack of detailed study about the R -factor on the Longmen Shan fault zone. In this calculation, the R value of 0.9 is adopted because of more difficulties of creep slip on thrust faults than on strike-slip and normal faults.…”
Section: Moment Accumulation Rate In the Seismogenic Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent ALS campaigns have yielded digital representations of topography at resolutions suffi cient to make measurements of earthquake-related surface deformation (e.g., Hudnut et al, 2002;Bevis et al, 2005;Oskin et al, 2007Oskin et al, , 2010aOskin et al, , 2010bOskin et al, , 2012Prentice et al, 2009;DeLong et al, 2010;Hilley et al, 2010Hilley et al, , 2012. For example, ALS effectively depicts fault trace geometries and stream channels that are offset by structures such as the San Andreas fault (e.g., Arrowsmith and Zielke, 2009;DeLong et al, 2010). Systematic analyses of these data reveal geomorphic features that are barely perceivable in the fi eld, but can fundamentally change our inferences about paleoseismic records and fault segmentation (e.g., Zielke et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sallenger et al 1999), monitoring of landslides (Dietrich et al 2001, Glenn et al 2006, Ventura et al 2011, measurement of volcanic deformation (Hasegawa et al 2007), identification of faults (Haugerud et al 2003, Sherrod et al 2004, Cunningham et al 2006, Kondo et al 2008, Arrowsmith and Zielke 2009, and estimates of slip rate (Frankel et al 2007). In the last decade, there have been several studies on the geometry of fault scarps using highresolution LiDAR data (Chan et al 2007, Begg and Mouslopoulou 2010, DeLong et al 2010, Hilley et al 2010, Amos et al 2010. However, investigations on the spatial distribution of slope and aspect on active fault scarps, as well as the statistical analysis of these scarp parameters, are still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%