2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.03709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Tolerant Model Predictive Control of Quad-Rotor Helicopters with Actuator Fault Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, in all mentioned methods, sensitivity of control systems to parameter variation is not completely investigated, or distinct mechanism for disturbance rejection is not introduced. In Izadi et al (2011), Model Predictive Control (MPC) is applied to calculate a stabilizing control signal and satisfy saturation constraint during abrupt changes in the quadrotor dynamics; however, gyroscopic effects resulting from the rigid body rotation are neglected, and simplified dynamics of quadrotor is utilized. To the best of authors' knowledge, the problem of disturbance rejection and input saturation for full nonlinear uncertain model of quadrotor is not investigated simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in all mentioned methods, sensitivity of control systems to parameter variation is not completely investigated, or distinct mechanism for disturbance rejection is not introduced. In Izadi et al (2011), Model Predictive Control (MPC) is applied to calculate a stabilizing control signal and satisfy saturation constraint during abrupt changes in the quadrotor dynamics; however, gyroscopic effects resulting from the rigid body rotation are neglected, and simplified dynamics of quadrotor is utilized. To the best of authors' knowledge, the problem of disturbance rejection and input saturation for full nonlinear uncertain model of quadrotor is not investigated simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this attention and the fact that some of the schemes are becoming reasonably 'mature', there are two factors which are significant obstacles to further testing of state-of-the-art schemes -especially for aerospace applications: these are cost and safety. In response to these two factors, there has been significant interest in applying state-of-the-art FTC schemes to multi-rotor UAVs -particularly to the so-called quadrotor (see for example [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]). This is largely due to their simple build, relatively low cost, and the convenience of undertaking tests in a controlled safe laboratory environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is more flexible than PFTC and can compensate faults with large magnitude which cannot be compensated by PFTC. Some previous works on AFTC of quadrotor in [8][9][10] are proposed. In these AFTC approaches, the fault is diagnosed first and then the controller or actuator output based on fault estimation result is increased to compensate the fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%