1999
DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5428.718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Slip Rates at Depth from Recurrence Intervals of Repeating Microearthquakes

Abstract: Unique attributes in sequences of recurring, similar microearthquakes at Parkfield, California, provide a means for inferring slip rate at depth throughout the active fault surface from the time intervals between sequence events. Application of the method using an 11-year microseismicity record revealed systematic spatial and temporal changes in the slip rate that were synchronous with earthquake activity and other independent measures of fault-zone slip. If this phenomenon is found to be generally common beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
265
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(2 reference statements)
12
265
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slip of each event is estimated from extrapolation of the empirical relation, d = 1.56×10 −7 ×M o 1/3 , between the scalar moment M o (dyne·cm) and the slip d (cm) reported by Somerville et al (1999). Hiramatsu et al (2011) pointed out that this relation provided reasonable values for similar aftershocks of the 2007 Noto Hanto earthquake-an inland earthquake-in contrast to the relation reported by Nadeau and Johnson (1998) for repeating earthquakes at a plate boundary, that has been applied to the case of repeating earthquakes in California (Nadeau and McEvilly, 1999), in northeastern Japan (Igarashi et al, 2003;Uchida et al, 2004Uchida et al, , 2009Matsuzawa, 2011), in Sumatra (Yu et al, 2013), and in Taiwan (Chen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The slip of each event is estimated from extrapolation of the empirical relation, d = 1.56×10 −7 ×M o 1/3 , between the scalar moment M o (dyne·cm) and the slip d (cm) reported by Somerville et al (1999). Hiramatsu et al (2011) pointed out that this relation provided reasonable values for similar aftershocks of the 2007 Noto Hanto earthquake-an inland earthquake-in contrast to the relation reported by Nadeau and Johnson (1998) for repeating earthquakes at a plate boundary, that has been applied to the case of repeating earthquakes in California (Nadeau and McEvilly, 1999), in northeastern Japan (Igarashi et al, 2003;Uchida et al, 2004Uchida et al, , 2009Matsuzawa, 2011), in Sumatra (Yu et al, 2013), and in Taiwan (Chen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…S6). CSS has some similarity with the graphical representation of slip by Nadeau & McEvilly (1999) where slip of repeating event clusters is added within circles of constant diameter. Here, we additionally consider the size of the events from scaling relations.…”
Section: Representation Of Seismicity Using the Cumulative Seismic Slmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lower-magnitude events (e.g. (Nadeau and McEvilly, 1999;Nadeau and McEvilly, 2004; 47 Vidale et al, 1994) ). While these smaller earthquakes don't generate significant ground 48 shaking, they, together with associated slow-slip transients, may modify the short-term 49 probability of rupture of larger nearby sections of the fault exposed to transient stress 50…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%