2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault detection and diagnosis of non-linear non-Gaussian dynamic processes using kernel dynamic independent component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, where subscript ij denotes the element of i-th row and j-th column of a matrix, operator · denotes the inner product of vectors, and k(·,·) denotes the kernel function (Fan and Wang, 2014). Kernel function allows us to compute the inner product of vectors in feature space without considering the explicit form of nonlinear mapping.…”
Section: Data Whitening In Feature Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, where subscript ij denotes the element of i-th row and j-th column of a matrix, operator · denotes the inner product of vectors, and k(·,·) denotes the kernel function (Fan and Wang, 2014). Kernel function allows us to compute the inner product of vectors in feature space without considering the explicit form of nonlinear mapping.…”
Section: Data Whitening In Feature Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2007) proposed a modified KICA through combining a modified ICA with the kernel technique. Fan and Wang (2014) proposed a kernel dynamic independent component analysis (KDICA) method and a non-linear contribution plot for monitoring a non-linear non-Gaussian dynamic process. Kaneko and Funatsu (2015) proposed a new index to diagnose the process variables that contribute to process faults using a data density-based MSPC model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para evaluar estas potencialidades el enfoque kernel-MEWMA con dinámica reforzada fue aplicado en el problema de prueba TEP, mostrando una alta capacidad para detectar, con pocas falsas alarmas y bajos tiempos de latencia, todos los fallos considerados, independientemente de su naturaleza o magnitud. En comparación con otros enfoques kernel previamente reportados en la literatura de diagnóstico de fallos [14][15][16][17], esta propuesta demostró que es posible mejorar el desempeño del sistema de detección ante fallos de pequeña magnitud al considerar la dinámica anterior del proceso, y realizar un ajuste adecuado de las herramientas involucradas.…”
Section: Capítulo 2: Métodos Kernel Para Detectar Fallos De Pequeña Munclassified
“…Among the methods based on MSPM, fault diagnosis methods mainly include two types: one is contribution plot method, another is fault reconstruction method. The main idea of contribution plot method is when monitoring statistics detecting a fault, these variables which have the largest contribution to the statistics are considered to be the fault variables (Dunia et al 1998; Fan et al 2014). Contribution plot method does not require prior knowledge, and is easy to be used for online fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%