2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00202-021-01213-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault current limiters: a case study of protection and operational continuity for FPSOs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Figure 5, 5.7 milliseconds after the fault occurred, the R-SFCL resistance suddenly increased. For a 50 Hz power system, this means reacting within the first period (de Souza et al, 2021). However, it should be noted that the R-SFCL resistance and temperature continue at a high value after the fault.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Figure 5, 5.7 milliseconds after the fault occurred, the R-SFCL resistance suddenly increased. For a 50 Hz power system, this means reacting within the first period (de Souza et al, 2021). However, it should be noted that the R-SFCL resistance and temperature continue at a high value after the fault.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario is the maximum fault current case, which has a first asymmetric peak current (Ip) around to 6.0 kApeak and a symmetric current (Is) around to 2.5 kArms. The air-core reactor was specified to reduce the prospective fault current in 60%, and the values in Table I were calculated as indicated in [35]. were is obtained through a matrix solution of the equivalent circuit shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%