2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault classification and faulted phase selection for transmission line using morphological edge detection filter

Abstract: In this paper, a novel algorithm for detecting and classifying faults in transmission lines is proposed. The algorithm is based on mathematical morphology (MM) and initial current traveling waves. A new mathematical edge detection (MED) filter to extract the transient features from the original fault signal is designed. This MED filter can fast and accurately detect the arrival time and polarity of traveling waves in all conditions. The appropriate criteria of fault classification and faulted-phase selection a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of these aforementioned advantages, the proposed and also many literature works carried out the pre‐processing of signal using the DWT analysis for training the classifiers such as ANN, Fuzzy, Modified Fuzzy Q‐learning, Fuzzy‐ARTMAP and ANFIS classifier. The work in presents classification of all the conventional faults such as LG, LL, LLG and LLLG fault by using the classifier such as ANN, ANFIS, Chebyshev Neural Network (Ch‐NN), Decision tree, Fuzzy and Modified Fuzzy Q‐learning, and multi‐layer perceptron (MLP) neural network with its accuracy of classification lies in the range of 92% to 100%. Nevertheless, all these works, presents the identification and location of conventional fault without considering the HIF.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these aforementioned advantages, the proposed and also many literature works carried out the pre‐processing of signal using the DWT analysis for training the classifiers such as ANN, Fuzzy, Modified Fuzzy Q‐learning, Fuzzy‐ARTMAP and ANFIS classifier. The work in presents classification of all the conventional faults such as LG, LL, LLG and LLLG fault by using the classifier such as ANN, ANFIS, Chebyshev Neural Network (Ch‐NN), Decision tree, Fuzzy and Modified Fuzzy Q‐learning, and multi‐layer perceptron (MLP) neural network with its accuracy of classification lies in the range of 92% to 100%. Nevertheless, all these works, presents the identification and location of conventional fault without considering the HIF.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with the wavelet transform in [5, 9, 17, 18], S transform in [8] and time‐time transform [22], the type of computation required in MM includes only addition, subtraction, maximum, and minimum operations without any multiplication and/or division [2325]. Therefore, the proposed IMG in this study has a much lower computation burden and feasibility of implementation.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of training is to make the distribution of G(z) as close as possible to the distribution of real data. The goal of D is to achieve the binary classification of input data [16]. If the input comes from real samples, the output of D is 1; if the input is G(z), the output of D is 0.…”
Section: Gan Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%