Breastfeeding or formula feeding in later infancy was correlated with the risk of developing iron deficiency anemia by Clark et al 1 in a secondary analysis of an observational study in a large sample of Chinese infants. Surprisingly, the authors did not consider complementary feeding habits in the data analysis or interpretation, although it is a public health consensus that the iron content of complementary feeding addresses the high iron requirements during the second 6 months of life. We had the opportunity to examine recent trends in iron intake and iron status in infants in Germany, where introduction of iron-rich complementary feeding between 4 and 6 months of age is a fundamental part of the pediatric guidelines. In a secondary analysis of 2 dietary studies conducted 5 years apart (2006-2009, 2011-2013), we found that in both studies (n = 76 and 73, respectively), 2,3 the iron intake was far below reference values and lower recently (approximately 4 mg/day between 6 and 10 months). At age 10 months, in the earlier study, 11 of 53 (21%) breastfed infants and 0 of 23 formula-fed infants presented with iron deficiency (serum ferritin <12 µg/L), but in the more recent study, iron deficiency was found in 18 of 50 breastfed infants (36%) and in 7 of 23 formula-fed infants (30%). In either study sample (except the earlier formula group), 1 infant had iron deficiency anemia. 4 Parallel time trends in the iron content of important infant foods helped explain these data, because both the lower iron content of the formula marketed and the lower mean meat content of the jars used in complementary feeding in the recent study might have contributed to the present-day low total iron intake and inferior iron status. Given that interpretation of iron status in infancy remains hampered by insufficient knowledge about adequate iron status measures, 5 comprehensive dietary background data are indispensable.