2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue tests on straight steel–concrete composite beams subjected to hogging moment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concrete flange was attached to the steel beam using shear studs, as shown in Figure 2(b). Lin et al (2013) tested three continuous composite beams subjected to cyclic loads. The initial static test in this investigation was selected to validate Model 3.…”
Section: Fe Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concrete flange was attached to the steel beam using shear studs, as shown in Figure 2(b). Lin et al (2013) tested three continuous composite beams subjected to cyclic loads. The initial static test in this investigation was selected to validate Model 3.…”
Section: Fe Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the field test results and numerical results reported herein, together with the previous laboratory test results (Lin et al, 2013c), the present strengthening method was proved to be effective for strengthening the aged steel railway bridges. In addition, according to the previous studies (Lin et al, 2013a(Lin et al, , 2014b, when the repeated load was smaller than that of the initial cracking load of the concrete, cyclic (or fatigue) loading will not obviously affect the static loading behavior of the composite structures. For the present strengthening method, the concrete was designed to resist the service load without any cracking.…”
Section: Nonlinear Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…De acordo com a literatura, esta dispersão pode ser explicada porque o concreto é um material heterogêneo, sendo assim a tensão de ruptura varia de um corpo de prova para o outro e, como não é possível ensaiar o mesmo corpo de prova que foi rompido, para determinar a resistência à flexão simples sob carga centrada, a relação entre tensões varia ainda mais de uma amostra para a outra. Talvez, devido a este problema, alguns autores optam por aplicar tensões mais baixas, com ciclos pré-estabelecidos, e apresentam medidas de deformação sem ruptura dos corpos de prova [16,19,23].…”
Section: Figura 8: Resultados Do Ensaio De Fadigaunclassified